When I watch the Oscars this year, my preferences will not be for any film’s acting or story, but for its nostalgia.
My last blog spelled out as many reasons as there were defendants in The Trial of the Chicago 7. For Nomadland, it is a single, sweeping reason, much like its settings in Southwest deserts, Northwest coasts, and Dakota Badlands. While I attended several antiwar demonstrations that followed Chicago in 1968, I was a vagabond–a nomad–for parts of 1976 & ’77 spending nights at a time in campgrounds, joining random travelers around campfires, playing in jam sessions, and landing in various places in the American west offering seasonal employment.
Canning peas, training hops, picking cherries, installing shelves in a brand new 3M warehouse, let’s just say that I looked far more like Abbie Hoffman than Jon Ossoff, and that I could have easily been the young hitchhiker who bums a cigarette from Fern before listening to her recite Shakespeare.
Recusal from a decision for Best Film may be an ethical obligation, but my memory reserves the right to two votes: Chicago 7, Best Screenplay; Nomadland, Best Cinematography.
Enough praise has been heaped on Nomadland, that no one needs me to elaborate on it. What hasn’t been described is what remains in place in the places Fern passes through.
Having lived in the Dakotas for most of the Ford through the Carter and into the Reagan years, I hear many of the behind-the-scenes details of what surfaces in national news about the Keystone Pipeline, the super-spreader Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, proposals to add Putin’s pawn to Mt. Rushmore, voter suppression on the reservations, and a hit-and-run driver who looks like he might get away with it because he’s a Republican attorney general.
Sounds impossible? Well, it already happened in 2003 with South Dakota’s sitting Republican US Representative, former governor and attorney general.
Thanks to social media, I hear from friends who live in the two states, some not far from the capital cities, Bismarck and Pierre (pronounced peer, don’t you know?). They don’t even need to tag me since I subscribe to their pages, the most informative of which is the Dakota Standard, co-published, co-written, and co-edited by Tom Lawrence, my co-conspirator back at The Collegian, South Dakota State University’s student paper, back in our my mischief-making days.
Aside from SD Gov. Kristi Noem, a laughable Trumpoholic and Jim Crow Republican already vying for a spot on the 2024 ticket, Dakota Territory is gaining much attention this week in the US House arguments both for and against statehood for Washington DC.
Democrats cite the sparse populations of the two states, barely more than DC, which has as much of an edge over Vermont and Wyoming. Dakota Territory, they point out, would have been admitted as one state in keeping with the way western lands were added, but Republicans, who dominated the federal government in the late 19th Century realized they could have two states instead of one–and four senators instead of two.
True, but oversimplified. It was the railroad magnates, Republican donors, who noticed that their two routes running east-west unified two lines of settlements and were far enough apart that they could draw a boundary between them for two states approximately equal in both size and population.
A straight line on a map, as a local comic once cracked, means that “no one gives a shit,” but the boundary between North and South Dakota served a purpose still being felt today: minority rule. The combined 1.65 million people of the two states have double the representation that the nearly 40 million people of California have in the US Senate.
Strangely, there is a natural boundary that divides Dakota Territory in near equal halves. Flowing from the northwest corner out of Montana, the Missouri River curves into Bismarck and then rolls just about due south all the way past Pierre before resuming its east-southeast direction and becoming part of the southern border with Nebraska.
Along the river, farmers joke that the Missouri is “too thin to plow and too thick to drink,” but east of it is rich with corn, wheat, sunflower, soy, alfalfa, and other crops. The west is arid–which is why the federal government assigned Indians reservations there–including the Badlands so stunningly portrayed in the scenes where Fern is asked what she sees:
“Rocks!”
SDSU students commonly identified themselves as “West River” or “East River” before specifying any town or county, which tells you that an east-west separation of the territory would have had some agricultural, economic, and demographic logic. Moreover, the contrived east-west line not only cut through ranch and range land, but through two Sioux reservations, doubling the confusion already created by tribal versus federal jurisdiction. Then again, that very confusion was part of the premise to suppress votes on the Standing Rock and Sisseton reservations following the election of North Dakota Democrat Heidi Heitkamp to the US Senate in 2012. By 2018, restrictions such as requiring street addresses were in place to disqualify residents of reservations that never had street names–postal carriers just knew who and where you were–and Heitkamp’s seat was retaken by a Republican.
To deny DC statehood, today’s Jim Crow Republicans haven’t cited the Dakotas by name, but at least one has insisted that having mines is a condition of statehood. The Mount Rushmore State has not only mines in its Black Hills, but the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology founded in 1885, four years before statehood, and represented with varying degrees of success on athletic fields and courts by its Hardrockers, a name that has nothing to do with music but everything to do with its degree programs.
Republicans still attempting to keep at least one foot on the surface of Planet Earth have kept mum on their fringe members’ claims regarding mines and car dealerships, instead claiming that states tend to enter the union two at a time, a la Alaska and Hawaii, Maine and Missouri. Kind of like Noah’s Ark, except that instead of male and female we would get liberal and conservative for the sake of what gullible people call “balance.”
Since DC is a city with minorities that outnumber its white population, it is certain to send two Democrats to the senate. The only other place vying for statehood right now, Puerto Rico, would do the same–bilingual, no less, which would further offend a Republican Party that is using state legislatures to transform itself into a Jim Crow Reality Show.
While it’s nice that my former home states–I lived in both, two years North, five South–are getting this inadvertent attention, it is a brand of nostalgia I’d rather see on the big screen than on the nightly news.
Then again, I can’t help but be amused at how adamantly Republicans deny that their state-by-state efforts to restrict voting is anything but a return to Jim Crow America. How painful it must be for them to know they got to hide their nostalgia away.
-30-

https://www.history.nd.gov/lincoln/image39.html
Here’s an 1878 Library of Congress map with tech that allows for close inspection: https://www.loc.gov/resource/g4170.cws00194/?r=0.748,0.583,0.111,0.051,0
























