All Over Now, Baby Red White & Blue

Kendrick Lamar is America’s newest version of A Complete Unknown.

So hilarious to hear so many fellow white people who have been in awe of what Bob Dylan did at the Newport Folk Festival in 1965 now complain of what just happened at Superbowl 2025.

Or dismiss it as so many are doing. One post on social media used the tongue-in-cheek meme “Marked Safe From,” as he put it, “whatever message was supposedly delivered…” A response landed immediately: “That’s because you were the subject, not the student.” From bullshit to bullseye!

This includes white folks my age who recall when Dylan electrified the folk world in both senses of the word, and those younger who just learned the details in the current film. Makes me wonder if Lamar thought of the analogy before casting Samuel L. Jackson in the would-be-moderator’s role of Pete Seeger. Or if he may have hummed Strike another match and start anew/ It’s all over now, Baby Blue before choosing “TV Off” as his parting shot.

Say what you will about the Halftime Show, the most compelling message was already delivered by a commercial barely halfway into the first quarter.

But only if you felt as much as heard the National Anthem before kickoff. I can’t recall the melody ever before accompanied by a subtle, steady drum roll. The piano and voice may have been a liberating jazz, but those drums kept the tune grounded in America’s conflicted history.

New Orleanian Jon Baptiste’s rendition of the Anthem was as fitting a forerunner for Lamar as John the Baptist was for his cousin who would also claim all attention with an equally radical, if peace-making, message. Between the two was a football game that soon turned into a rout and commercials that ranged from hilarious to serious, and from whimsical to earnest.

Madison Avenue has made the broadcast its own celebration, much in the way that the Oscars serves Hollywood. Most ads that air during the protracted game–from all the pregame hype (Oscars’ red carpet) through the “Halftime Show” (O’s best song nominees) to the post-game ceremony (after parties)–are premieres. Lavish and sensational, some blunt, others sentimental, they are a heavy investment for our approval.

Eight million dollars a pop according to commentator Tom Brady, himself a co-star with Snoop Dog in a public service address against hate, near the start of the game. The text is not denunciation but illustration, a white and a black guy going at each other, airing out both sides. Then a pause before the final line, the first to include the pronoun “we” so it doesn’t matter who says it: I hate that we have to make a commercial about this.

For as long as I can remember, I’ve spent the day after the Super Bowl picking out highlights of the commercials. This year, however, I’m taken more by a theme that evolved like a passion play with the Anthem as the opening scene and halftime as the finale.

In between was a lengthy ad that had no voice over. We do hear LL Cool J’s song “Mama Said Knock You Out,” and will later learn that it was produced by Pfizer to highlight the company’s cancer research efforts.

A camera takes us through the open door of a hospital room and to the bed of a small boy who lies there hooked up to an IV and who knows what else. He looks out the window, and is determined. No more! He unhooks himself, gets up, gets into boxing trunks, goes to the sink, splashes water on his face, gets his boxing gloves on, and out the door and down the corridor he goes, throwing punches, shuffling his feet, dodging punches, leaning in.

Nurses, doctors, other patients, hospital staff and visitors applaud and cheer him on. Out the door he goes and down a main street lined with cheering crowds on both sides. Up some stairs he goes–yes, this is a play on Rocky–and onto a landing for the entrance to a public building, arms raised as he looks out toward public buildings waving American flags. A title finally comes onto the screen:

We Will Beat Cancer!

All well and good. Unanimous approval, as we’ve already joined the cheering, applauding, smiling crowd. But what happens if we add context, if we start connecting dots?

What if you recall, just one touchdown and kickoff ago, the video that played during the National Anthem? What if you recall the camera’s pan to someone saluting our flag with ramrod posture and a stern expression who just days earlier signed an executive order to stop all funding for medical research?

Oh, have I upset you? A moment ago were you entirely with me in smiling approval of the boy’s recovery and determination? But now I’ve played a dirty trick and made you uncomfortable?

That’s what Kendrick Lamar did with the Halftime Show. Argue whether it was entertainment or not, art or not, “appropriate” (whatever that crap, cop-out of a word is) or not, it was a litmus test. To those willing to listen, he could not have been any more American, any more red, white, and blue.

To the rest, he is now a complete unknown.

-661-

Lollipops & Rainbows

A day before The Townie posted my essay on weeding, the removal of old books from local libraries, the local daily ran a front-page story on the “success” of the Newburyport Public Library’s new volunteer program.

“New” because the volunteer program was suspended in the summer of 2023 by Mayor Sean Reardon.  “New” because the new gig was crafted by the newly appointed Head Librarian Kevin Bourque.  Also “new” because none of volunteers at the time are with the new crop.  Considering that all of them were retirees, you could say that they, too, were weeded.

Nor could any of them rejoin the renewal.  That would be awkward in light of the petition to the City Council that they and a few supporters, including me, signed calling for an investigation into the manner of their dismissal.  The petition was successful, although the delay in choosing an investigator allowed a City Hall official who played a key role time to find a municipal position and new home in Western Massachusetts.

Coincidence?  Maybe.  But is it also coincidence that the local paper heralds nothing but success just as the investigation is drawing to a close in February? Here’s a sentence that appears midway in the 850-word report:

After collecting feedback from staff as well as former volunteers, Bourque crafted a new program and policy that was approved last May by the board of directors as well as library staff.

The phrase “from staff as well as volunteers” is no doubt true because he did listen to anyone who walked through his open door at times he set, including me.  And a few of the dismissed vols told me that they have spoken to him.  However, in the context of this all-lollipops report, those six words create a rainbow impression that they approve of all that has happened, and that all is forgiven and forgotten.

Another item in the report appears as a glaring contradiction to anyone who has followed the NPL saga, but would go unnoticed by casual readers.  A reason for dismissal was that vols were doing staff work, a breach of the union contract.

That was then.  Now, Bourque openly reveals that the new vols are doing nothing but reshelving books in the stacks.  How is that task not among the various items in a librarian’s job description?   Call it a clear case of “Which is it?”

But that’s a rhetorical question. Starting with Reardon’s suspension, this has been a shell game to disguise the removal of people well-acquainted with local history who actually knew how to research and could help patrons find things.

Reasons given for the dismissal begin with “bullying” and “harassment,” but no one who knows any of the elderly, professional, and highly competent dismissed vols believes that for a moment.  Which may be why no incident or quote was ever specified despite numerous requests for them over these past 18 months.

My own speculation is that many young people expect a raise of inflection and or a giggle at the end of every spoken sentence, as well as smiley face or heart or huggy emojis after written ones.  Normal talk, people my post-menopausal age often find, sounds angry to them.  A matter-of-fact question is not heard but felt as assault and battery.

To nail down a breach of the union contract, charges against the dismissed vols included money.  We were told in the daily paper that they took money from patrons.  In the most extreme case of a public institution “airing dirty laundry” that I’ve ever seen, the NPL website posted it prominently for five weeks.  The intended impression was to make the dismissed vols appear to be exploiting their role.  The truth is that some patrons gave them coins for the photocopier because the vols were familiar with machines those patrons had never used.

So much for the veracity of NPL staff.  Added to all of that, Bourque’s recent, unwitting admission regarding shelving seems like old news.

What’s new is the claim, or at least the impression, that the dismissed vols had a say in Bourque’s redesigned volunteer program.  It should not take John Kerry to come here and tell us of the consequence of not answering false claims.  And some of us still wonder if Kamala Harris missed the Swiftboat by never answering the repeated charge that she advocated sex-change operations for penitentiary inmates.

Don’t mean to tax your patience with yet another critique of a public library, but false information and insinuations that go unanswered stick.  For that I reason, I write this not out of choice, but of obligation.

-660-

Photo from The Townie, an on-line “public square for the passionate voices of Greater Newburyport.” Here’s a link to another Townie essay critical of NPL–this one about the “cultural homogenization and the sidelining of local knowledge” since Reardon’s banishment of the Archival Center’s volunteers.
https://www.townienbpt.com/education/2024/11/12/the-newburyport-public-library-can-do-more-to-promote-our-communitys-diverse-past

A Return to Manifest Destiny

Anyone have William McKinley on a bingo card for the Inaugural Address?

When I closed my eyes and listened not for content but sound, it was easy to think I was hearing a defective robot reading endless instructions for day-to-day life in a penitentiary. Blame that on my country’s transformation from democracy to oligarchy and the realization that everything I grew up believing about America is no longer true.

Crime does pay. Might does make right. Public offices are openly for sale. Threats and menace are free speech. Ethics are for suckers. One man is above the law. And we continue to stand at attention and put hands over hearts while singing an anthem that, if honest, would end with “the land of the gullible and the home of the indifferent.”

The impenitent felon’s cement-mixer drone nearly put me to sleep as I lamented the loss, but the name McKinley hit my ears like an explosion of a steamship’s over-worked boiler while afloat in Havana Harbor.

Ask historians about our 25th president, and they’ll immediately tell you that he oversaw America’s transformation into an imperial power in 1898. His declaration of war on Spain began with our invasion of Cuba and was quickly followed by a take-over of the Philippines and the annexation of Hawai’i. Some will add that he claimed to be torn by the decision and, alone on his way to bed one night, knelt on the floor and prayed for guidance. God, McKinley announced the next day, told him to send in the troops.*

Trump omits such details, telling us only that McKinley “was a great businessman” who “made this country a lot of money.” Nor does he mention that McKinley needed a pretext to invade Cuba and start his war. Just last month, in a blog headlined by a more recent American pretext for war, “Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club,” I happened to quote the slogan that cites McKinley’s pretext: “Remember the Maine!”

I recall the cry from history textbooks when I was but a schoolboy. Little did I know that it was truncated from the full slogan at the time: “Remember the Maine and to Hell with Spain!” The text told us that the Spaniards blew up the USS Maine, but years later I would read historians who say that the cause was never determined. Given all evidence and circumstances, they figure, it’s more likely that the boiler blew up on its own, or that it was an inside job calculated to raise American public support for war.

When you’re done laughing at Trump’s claims regarding the Panama Canal, put them into historical context. In addition to McKinley”s “Remember,” we have Pres. Polk’s false claim of “American blood on American Soil” to start the Mexican War, LBJ’s fabricated Gulf of Tonkin incident to send American troops into Vietnam, and W’s imagined “weapons of mass destruction.” If Trump wants America to re-take the Panama Canal, all he needs is what those four had: a pretext.

And just like that, his inaugural address nailed one: “China is running the Canal!”

He could have invoked–and before long he will invoke–the Monroe Doctrine. Connected to his insistence that we must “take back” the Panama Canal, this is no longer a joke. Nor is the seemingly superficial change of the name Gulf of Mexico to “Gulf of America.” Interesting how we never heard any talk of the Canal or the Gulf or Greenland or Canada until after the election, unless they also happen to be four brand names of eggs.

Except for the resurrection of McKinley, none of this was a surprise at the inauguration. In a speech that could have been titled “Manifest Destiny Redux,” however, he surprised everyone by calling for a restoration of the name “McKinley” to Mt. Denali in Alaska. That’s the centuries-old Koyukon tribe’s name meaning “tall one” for North America’s highest peak. Given the time and the occasion, and considering the general purpose of an inaugural address, it may have sounded like a minor line item in a long wish-list.

Many Americans are still laughing at what sound like geographical fantasies, and it is easy to joke about renaming or re-classifying a body of water or a tract of land for no cartographical, geographical, or geological reason. I can still hear my father laughing at Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy’s bid to have Lake Champlain declared the sixth Great Lake, no matter that Dad died in 1999.

We laugh at our own peril. No matter what Rand McNally does with its atlases or what the United Nations does with its maps, a mere presidential order gives Republican governors and state legislatures a pretext to decide which textbooks and atlases can be used in public schools and which cannot. That, in turn, puts limits on what may be taught.

Add to that his white-nationalist claims also made by the MAGA crowd, that school children are now taught to “be ashamed” of their country and that white children are made to “feel guilty.” That will determine what those limits are.

Names are not on bingo cards, but they do appear in history texts and on maps. Might be a good idea to stop laughing at them and start learning what we would rather not repeat.

-659-

*The second thing historians will say of McKinley is that he was assassinated in the first months of his second term. Shot at a Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York, by a self-proclaimed anarchist, he was rushed to a hospital. He gradually improved for a week, but took a sudden, severe turn and died on the eighth day of gangrene caused by a bullet that the doctors had missed. In a building back at the Exposition directly across the street from where the shooting occurred was an exposition of a new x-ray machine far more powerful than any at the hospital. Had they brought McKinley there, that machine would have saved his life.

On Sept. 14, 1901, Vice-President Theodore Roosevelt was sworn in and immediately became the first president to have Secret Service protection.

The Assassination of the US President William McKinley, Buffalo (NY) 1901, Achille Beltrame, 1901
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/president-william-mckinley-is-shot
Painting entitled ‘American Progress’, by John Gast, depicting ‘Manifest Destiny’ (the religious belief that the United States should expand from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean in the name of God). In 1872 artist John Gast painted a popular scene of people moving west that captured the view of Americans at the time. Called ‘Spirit of the Frontier’ and widely distributed as an engraving portrayed settlers moving west, guided and protected by a goddess-like figure and aided by technology (railways, telegraphs), driving Native Americans and bison into obscurity. It is also important to note that angel is bringing the ‘light’ as witnessed on the eastern side of the painting as she travels towards the ‘darkened’ west.’ USA.

Why Not a Panama Hat?

Like many friends, I had resolved not to watch.

But over the weekend, friends started calling long distance, as they do on momentous days. From the assassination of John Lennon to 9/11 to the passing of Jimmy Carter, we have consoled each other over the years, and we do it now. By the time the clock struck midnight, I noticed a thread running through the conversations which prompted a blog headlined, “In This 11th Hour.”

That, in turn, reminded me that I am, after all, a newspaper columnist, and so I tuned in to the inauguration out of obligation, or at least a sense of it.  Since I finished and posted “11th Hour” at the end of the literal eleventh hour, I waited a mere ten minutes for the swearing in. Those ten minutes have proved a fitting metaphor for the regurgitation of grievances, lies, and hate that followed, as all I could see was one thing:

Melania’s hat.

The hat atop her dark-blue outfit and her ramrod posture all seemed of a piece. In views from above, with her hands down by her side, she reminded me of my father’s floor-lamp, although darkness rather than light emanated from her face where the bulb would be. Concealing her eyes from any direct view, the wide-brimmed object’s crown appeared so slight that Melania at times looked like a serving tray for her much taller son, Barron, standing aside her. Numerous friends on social media wondered if the brim was to keep her husband’s obligatory kiss from reaching her face, but I wouldn’t dream of mentioning anything so personal.

Can’t decide if that hat is a haberdasher’s version of Musk’s Cybertruck or speculation of what Eva Braun might wear if she only lived another 80 years. Back in the 50s and 60s, there was a TV quiz-show called What’s My Line?  I swear, if she was on it in that outfit, I’d guess assassin. Melania never once took it off her head, not even when she was named and waved to a cheering crowd.

And so I was already lost in dark thought when the dark Mad Hatter himself got stuck in dark time. All mandates for DEI are now DOA, nor will there be any mandates for electric cars. Climate change? What change? What climate? It’s all “Drill, baby, drill!” into the looming Dark Ages. When he mentioned the canal, I lost track of his cargo, his ship’s manifest, his passengers’ destiny, and turned my attention back to Melania:

Why was it not a Panama hat?

But she wore rich threads, and the camera panned plenty more of it in the Capitol rotunda. With the MAGA rabble in their mad red hats kept out, and the MAGA privileged in their jewels welcomed inside–due to cold, so we’re told–it appeared that they were all in what was once called “their Sunday best.”

With a maudlin rendition of the “Battle Hymn of the Republic,” a few over-the-top benedictions that came close to ordaining Trump’s recrudescence as the Second Coming, countless mentions of God by everyone who spoke, and an adoring mood that stampeded the border into worship, the inauguration that took place yesterday was not so much a ceremony of state as a religious observance.

Separation of Church and State? What State?

Turns out I misunderstood Melania’s hat, and missed the white collar until an old SSC friend posted that she was “rockin’ the Amish pastor look.” More to the point, he adding something that begs the question of how the MAGA crowd–whether in, out, or at home–would have reacted had Barack Obama or Kamala Harris done it:

While taking the oath, the oaf never put his hand on the Bible on the serving tray held by the floor-lamp that stood beside him.

-658-

Anyone who thinks commentary on what one wears is off-limits is welcome to tell me just what the limits are for one who wears this.

MLK’s Method vs. Madness

Martin Luther King got a lot of mileage out of comparisons.

Urging churches and synagogues to act like headlights toward justice rather than taillights for public opinion, he compared them to cars.

Explaining his role in the civil rights movement, he compared himself to a drum major.

But he knew the march was slow when, regarding civil rights movements around the globe, he compared the “jet-like speed” of other countries to the “horse and buggy pace” of ours.

Nor was the irony—a comparison gone awry—lost on him in an era when TV ads implored us night after night to “See the USA in your Chevrolet!”

Contrasts, too.  What is a contrast but an inverted comparison?  To borrow one of King’s favorite words, contrasts can be irrefutable, as in his most quoted line that matches “color of their skin” against “content of their character.”

King once compared the American public to Rip Van Winkle.  Don’t know about video, but audio reveals a hilarious stand-up comic.

Frequent reactions of the congregation—a church in Lima, Ohio—tell you he is mugging Rip’s yawning, snoring, startled awakening, head-scratching, and dropping jaw.

Catching King’s attention in literature’s first attempt at American mythology was the poster of King George on a tree as Rip enters the woods.  It’s George Washington when he leaves.

Waiting for laughter to subside, he bellows as only he could: “Ol’ Rip slept through a revolution!”  Congregation roars, cheers mixed with laughter. They were awake, and they had a guy who could awaken others to the injustices they faced.

Speaking comparatively, today’s America hit the snooze button.  And yes, it was a landslide when you add the sleeping non-voters to the ones who took the knock-out pill.

But that’s a story already covered and debated.  Time to consider method over madness.

First noticed it 15 years ago, and it all came back last month when the first question at the 5th Annual William Lloyd Garrison Lecture was preceded by a disclaimer: “not comparing them…”

The questioner then asked if the imminent round-ups and mass deportations might call for resistance similar to that provoked by the infamous Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.

Dr. Kellie Carter Jackson paused before answering: “It’s not the same but it’s parallel.”

She, author of We Refuse: A Forceful History of Black Resistance, then fully agreed with the premise and offered suggestions.

Her riveting, char-broiled speech seasoned with surprising comic relief had a lot to do with the Fugitive Slave Act, and the question prompted a discussion of today’s parallels impossible to miss.

But she, too, avoided the word “comparison.”

Spin the clock back to January 21, 2010.  Supreme Court hands down Citizens United.  Days later, then-Rep., now-Sen. Ed Markey calls it “the worst decision since Dred Scott.”  For over a week, local civil rights leaders keep pouncing on him with loud indignation:

“Nothing can be compared to slavery!”

No one in the media or in political circles backs him up, other than to call it innocent overstatement and suggest he apologize.

Did they not know that Citizens United’s lawyers twisted the 13th Amendment granting citizenship to newly freed people into a case for granting effective citizenship to corporations?

The 13th Amendment was intended to, among other things, strike down Dred Scott, which directly ties it to Citizens United.

Adding to the irony, it’s the start of Black History Month, but no one thinks to seize this connection of present to past as a teachable moment.

Instead, they quash it, and we still have people fearful of making connections of what we live with today to the worst of what we’ve read of yesterday.

Comparisons are not equations.  They are a method of thought just as are descriptions, satire, and cause/effect relationships.  To avoid them is to limit our ability to think.

Case in point:  All these years we’ve also refused comparisons of anything in the present to the Nazis.

Swastikas flying at MAGA rallies, followed by open admiration of Adolph Hitler these past few years has barely changed that.  It should have changed as soon as 2015 with the ridicule of women and the handicapped, with the slurs and slander of Hispanics, with the demonization of the press, with the contempt for science, with absurd claims about crowd sizes, forest fires, windmills, hurricanes, with “very fine people.”

Last year we heard “poisoning the blood” and “They’re eating pets!”   What are we waiting for?  “Seig Heil”?

Makes me wonder if the implicit ban on comparisons paved the way for what may already be an equation.

Comparatively speaking, we cannot truly honor a drum major without the instruments necessary to play his tune.

-657-

The Stone of Hope in Washington DC, inspiration by a line from King’s “I Have a Dream” speech: “Out of the mountain of despair, a stone of hope.” The memorial opened to the public on August 22, 2011.
https://www.nps.gov/mlkm/index.htm
A detail of The Embrace, a memorial added to Boston Common two years ago honoring Martin Luther and Coretta Scott King.
https://www.architectmagazine.com/design/in-boston-the-embrace-honors-the-legacy-and-love-of-martin-luther-king-jr-and-coretta-scott-king_o

In This 11th Hour

Last night, just half a day before a cadre of billionaires takes over Washington DC, a friend I’ve known since we joined protests against LBJ and Nixon called to “observe the last day of the Republic.”

Quite an echo. Just a week earlier, a friend from the Ford and Carter years sent an email expressing a hope that “all of us who are out of reach of the fires can enjoy these final days of the USA’s version of the Weimar Republic.”

Within the reach of the California fires, those who have lost their homes and livelihoods are already listening to congressional Republicans putting conditions on disaster relief. That’s something that no one proposed when emergency relief was needed in Louisiana, Texas, North Carolina, or Florida, a fact which Republicans counter by simply insisting that it did. They falsely claimed last year that relief for North Carolina was delayed so that residents would leave, allowing the federal government to take over land. When that provoked right-wing militias to block FEMA workers from reaching residents in stricken areas, Fox News made sure that their audience thought the feds were ignoring them.

All by itself, regardless of who swears an oath on inauguration day, that tells us that the Republic born in 1776 is now dead.

If you think the difference in relief following natural disasters is too flimsy a measure here, or if you’re a bottom-liner who thinks money is all that matters, let me add this: California contributes $470 million more to the federal government than it receives from it. That’s about $150 million more than Louisiana, Texas, and North Carolina combined. Florida contributes about $209 million more than it receives, barely 45% of California’s federal contribution.*

But that’s how it is in a Republic not founded on numbers. Profit and loss does not appear in our Constitution, nor do cost-benefit tables to determine what canals and tunnels are dug, bridges and roads built, railroad track laid, and runways paved.

Instead, our Constitution is an expression of democratic ideals. E Pluribus Unum. Investments go where they are needed, not where they are hoarded. We are–or were–united in a country where no one is above the law, where there’s a separation of powers, and a separation of church and state.

All of that is now lost. E Pluribus Us Versus Them. And if any of “them” can hide in an attic long enough to write a diary, a future generation may read it and wonder what their parents and grandparents did to stop it.

For all of Trump’s claims that he knew nothing of Project 2025, he is already putting it into effect. Half of his high-level appointments were involved in its formation. In accordance with its call, round-ups for mass deportation of immigrants will, say reports, begin in Chicago by the end of this week. Federal agencies that have countered climate change will be terminated. So, too, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency that tracks and issues warnings for, among other things, hurricanes.

Why not? Total control must be impossible for the oligarchy to resist. It has Fox News to convince the MAGA crowd that Democrats control the weather which they use as a weapon of mass destruction in red states. It has a Supreme Court to rule that the president is above the law. It has a political party now controlling both houses of congress that unanimously grovels on bended knee to a lawless president.

And today, for a symbolic act to drive the point home, it has at least seven governors who have ordered that Old Glory be raised from its long-honored tradition of half-staff tribute to the late Pres. Jimmy Carter. This is a violation of the US Flag Code.

“No one wants to see that,” said the oligarchs’ frontman–who, fittingly, is the first American president to have his name and image flown from supporters’ homes and motor vehicles on flags alongside Old Glory, sometimes embossed on it. A second violation of the Code.**

With all that, convincing an inattentive, memory-challenged public that an oligarchy will serve as a democracy must have been easy. Reminds me of the ease described by historians in their accounts of Berlin in March, 1933. And it is that ease which makes the end of the American Republic especially hard to take.

-656-

*https://digg.com/finance/link/states-most-dependent-on-the-federal-government-ranked-59CWzbWb10

**https://us-flag.net/code/

Available on Amazon. As an advertisement (for the campaign or otherwise), this is yet a third violation of the US Flag Code.

Letters of Recommendation

When Tex asked me for a letter of recommendation, I could have told her that it was more of a favor to me than to her.

Enrolled in a community college as a consequence of financial limitations, she landed a scholarship while writing witty and insightful essays in my first semester composition class at Mass Bay CC. Always engaged, willing to answer and ask questions, she set her sights higher, and I told her that I would consider it an achievement of my own if I helped her get there.

“That’s because I remind you of yourself,” she smiled.

This was my 25th year teaching, so I kept a straight face effortlessly out of habit. I had heard a student say that once before, and it was true of a few others, so I could claim to have been prepared. But I wasn’t. And I was left to wonder how a young woman of Mexican and Korean descent in the business-as-usual turn of the last century could possibly remind this thoroughly white-boy from the times-they-are-a-changing Sixties of himself.

As luck would have it, she was applying to Boston College where, that very month, there was an exhibit of the Norwegian artist, Edvard Munch. Saving myself postage, I took the reference directly to the English Dept. rather than to the Admissions Office before going to the exhibit. A woman at the desk was taken by surprise, which caught the attention of the man in the office behind her.

“Oh, this goes to Admissions,” she said.

“Oh, of course, point me in that direction and I’ll take it,” I started to say.

He appeared at the open door and interrupted, “No, no, we’ll take it here.” Something in his voice told me he was onto my trick, but rather liked it. Neither of them asked why I would hand-deliver a letter of reference. Occurred to me that it would have more impact if I kept mum about being there to see Munch’s Scream. I pointed to the envelope as she put it in his hand:

“She’s as sharp as any student I’ve ever taught. A world of potential.”

Whether Tex needed the extra show of support is doubtful. That summer I received a note of thanks that told me she’d be at Boston College that fall.


That was my last year in the classroom. It was mid-way into my first year that I first had a student remind me of myself.

A black-haired kid of Mediterranean descent, David was far more plausible for the role, and in a way, he was my first real test of whether I would be willing to bend, if not break, institutional policy and procedure.

At the start of the second semester, the English Dept. at Bridgewater State College (now University) told us that our rosters were all full and that we were to admit no one whose name was not on our list. And so, at the start of day one, I stood before 25 freshman already seated, and I completed roll-call with their 25 names on my unalterable list. And then, out of the corner of my eye, I saw him step slowly through the open door.

“Are you Mr. Garvey?”

“That’s what the police call me.”

“Can I join your class?”

“Well, it’s full, and, uh…” Even as I spoke, I hated what I was about to say. I hated myself for being about to say it, but he spared me the ordeal:

“I can’t stay in the class I’m in. Dry. Dull. The teacher is all by the book. Friends in the dorm tell me you like to argue and joke, that you talk about things that matter.”

How do you say no to that? I turned to the class: “Well, now that the course intro is out of the way, let’s get right to your first assignment…”

While the class laughed, I turned to the newcomer who still had a pleading look on his face: “Have a seat,” I said. “If I throw you out now, they’ll throw me out. Congratulations! I’m stuck with you.”

I was reminded of how much he reminded me of myself when he asked for a letter of reference for a transfer to the Vermont Law & Graduate School a few years later. At times, I wondered if I was copying the letters written for me by profs at Salem State.

No, he never claimed to remind me of myself, but his letters from Vermont were loaded with “you should be here” and “you’d fit right in” additions, especially connected to his work with a group that arranged debates and speeches of presidential and congressional candidates. Pictures he sent include him with Al Gore, Jesse Jackson, Joe Biden, and a young mayor of Burlington named Bernie Sanders.


Connie was a student in what was frankly a “remedial” class, although colleges cannot use that word, and so it’s called “Developmental” or “Fundamental” or “Basic.”

Northeastern University had–possibly still has–a full program of such courses it calls “Alternative Freshman Year” that it advertised heavily in Connecticut, NYC, and New Jersey hoping to catch the attention of upper class parents of teenagers who dogged it in high school and failed to get into Ivy League or other prestigious colleges.

With a last name that reappears throughout American history since colonial times, Connie was among a handful of these who realized that this was a second chance, and her contributions to the class and her essays were impressive from the start. You could call that a stunt of mine as an undergrad at Salem State. After a few weeks, I contrived to catch her in the corridor and resolved to not mince words:

“What the hell are you doing here?”

She was startled, and I realized she thought I meant in that corridor at that time: “You should be an actual freshman about to become an actual sophomore. Not just here, but at any college.”

“I applied to St. Lawrence, Ithaca, Vassar, but I wasn’t admitted. Couldn’t even get into UConn.”

“My daughter’s at Vassar. You’d have made great friends. Instead, you blew off high school, and now you have to listen to her fed-up-with-slackers dad!”

She shrugged and nodded her head.

“You can transfer.”

“Oh?”

“Well, you’ll have to wait till next fall, but get it started now. How you doing in your other classes?”

“Very well.”

“Well, keep doing well. And ask at least two teachers to write letters for you. I’ll be the third.”

Midway through the second semester, Connie was admitted to St. Lawrence. However, she worried about the transition so much that she sent me a letter that summer saying that she may be back at Northeastern in the fall. I wasted no time:

“Dear Connie: If I see you on campus this fall, I will break both your arms. Get yourself to St. Lawrence. If anyone can do well there, you can do well. Just get there!”

That letter might get me in jail 30 years later, but I believe it did as much or more to get her into St. Lawrence than did the letter of reference.


There were several other students over 25 years who reminded me of myself to various degrees. Tex, Dave, and Connie happen to be the ones who asked for letters of reference which gave me the odd sensation of writing about myself.

Or of living vicariously through them. Was my insistence that Connie move way up into New York’s Adirondacks a do-over for choosing my own near-to-home comfort of Salem State over the sight-unseen, uncertain adventure of moving to Pittsburgh where I had been accepted–in my junior year of high school–at Duquesne University?

But I’d be remiss not to mention Helen, an unrelenting live-wire if ever one electrified. Most in the class thought she was hilarious, but a few thought her more of a scourge than a scream and were afraid of her. Born and raised in Denmark, she spoke English without a trace of an accent, but retained a Northern European sensibility of not letting anything slide. If she heard anything that didn’t agree with her, she pounced, and I was often forced into the role of arbitrator.

Luckily, she always tended more toward the comic than toward any identifiable ideology, and so no one ever complained about her. One student, talking to me in private, referred to Helen as my “side-kick,” by which he meant (I hope) that I like to provoke and Helen often seconded the provocation.

When the class was over, she let me know she had a job awaiting her in Copenhagen, with a magazine no less, no reference from me needed. Knowing that, I dared tell her that she made me wish I was twenty years younger. Her answer left me speechless:

“That’s because I remind you of yourself,” she smiled.

I’d have put that in her reference if only she had requested one. And in those of Tex, Dave, and Connie had I dared.

-655-

E Pluribus Whatever

Friends keep asking, and I keep answering that the 25-hour, 235-reader Moby-Dick Marathon went very well. Yes for many reasons, but only days later did my bell ring in one more that should be true of all public events, all readings, memorials, services, weddings, baptisms, trials, classes, assemblies:

Not once in the ten minutes I read or the 16 hours I listened did a cellphone intrude on us.


Forgive the vagueness of this days-later scene, but I’d rather not identify anyone or the place involved, nor offer any clues to that effect. I will say up front that it was not a self-help group of any kind.

About 30 people were present, evenly divided between men and women, most but not all of us taking turns addressing the group. Many, including me, were whimsical and comic, while others were poignant and personal, including a few describing the loss of children.

Maybe I should add that I may have been the youngest person present, no mean feat for a Truman baby. It was the first time I joined the monthly group, and only because New Year’s fell on a Wednesday did I have the day free. I regret that I may never be there again, and please keep that in mind when you hear this:

Prior to the start of presentations, our MC made a few introductory remarks, including the standard reminder to silence mobile devices. I chuckled at the reminder of how ringtones–and people actually taking calls in the theater while a film was on–drove me up a mandate when it spread like a pandemic among Screening Room audiences some ten years ago, but it hardly happens anymore. Everyone else, or so it seemed, reached for their phones and hit a button or two. Not me. I still do not own one.

Each of us spoke for five or ten minutes, and I believe it was while we were hearing the fifth speaker, that a ringtone came from a front corner of the room. The speaker continued while the tone sounded twice before a woman could get it out of a pocket, look at it, whisper a few words, and then put it away. The speaker never stopped, nor was anything said about the imposition before another speaker stepped to the mic.

May have been while the tenth or eleventh speaker was just starting that the same phone rang again. I clenched my teeth, but said nothing only because I was brand new to this group. Otherwise… Well, my parole officer may be reading this, so I better leave it unsaid. However, the fellow sitting next to me felt no such constraint:

Waving his hand at the speaker: “Excuse me! Excuse me!” And then pointing to the woman who, to my amazement, was answering the call: “Can you shut that thing off?” The whole room froze. He continued: “Or take the call outside.” She got up and left.

He then looked at the speaker: “I’m sorry. Can you start over again?”

The speaker did, and nothing else was said of the incident. It was if it never happened, except that in the transition to the next speaker, I put my hand on the fellow’s shoulder, and addressed him by name: “B—–, thank you for doing that! No one ever wants to do it, and no one will thank you even though most every one wants it done.”

With the next speaker ready to go, he simply nodded, and we both turned our attention to what we were there to hear. All was well until the speaker after that was mid-way into a moving account of personal loss, and the woman re-entered the room. Instead of going to her seat, she came right to our table and started explaining to my new friend (and ally in the futile war against technological imposition) why she “had to” take the call.

May have been ten years ago that I figured out that cellphoners have turned “emergency” into the biggest one-word joke in the history of language. So, of course it was “an emergency” involving a “doctor” and “couldn’t wait.” J—– simply said, “Well, then you shouldn’t have come here!” And she walked to her chair.

This time I was the one waving to the speaker: “I’m sorry, but can you go back to where you were looking out the window?” It wasn’t that far back, and I didn’t want to miss anything. He gladly complied, no doubt because he knew where the room’s attention had been redirected, and it wasn’t to, through, or at his window in a previous life.

There were no more interruptions, and the event soon ended as if there had never been any interruptions at all.


Next day I’m standing at a busy intersection in Melrose waiting for the walk sign.

Green comes on for the cars aside me, but none move. My mind is on something else–The Marathon? The spanakopita I’m about to have at the Iron Town Diner? The farce of the word “Emergency”? So I don’t look to see why the car doesn’t move. Five seconds pass before the second car sounds the horn. Just a bump, barely a beep, nothing that we would call “laying on,” and far short of blaring.

It works. First car finally starts, and a few get through the light before it turns red. During that time, a woman, perhaps my age, walks up to the corner and declares to me: “Some people have no patience!”

Nor did I have any patience: “What are you talking about? That driver sat here on green long enough to do his taxes. What’s the driver in the second car supposed to do? Offer to lick the envelope?”

Clearly, she was expecting immediate agreement, as she began with a stutter: “Wuh-wuh-wuh-well, there’s never any need for impatience. That’s my life’s motto!”

Irony was right on cue. We now had our walk sign, and she was crossing west while I was crossing north–not to mention that I had skipped breakfast and was ravenous for Iron Town. If not, I’d have asked if it ever occurred to her that the first driver was pre-occupied–most likely on a cellphone, perhaps texting–and that the second driver was actually doing the first a favor by letting him or her know that the light was now green. The second was certainly doing the third, fourth, fifth, etc. drivers a favor.

Instead, as we went our separate ways: “What your motto really says is ‘Let everything slide!'”


Next day, at the very beginning of NPR’s coverage of Jimmy Carter’s memorial in the Washington National Cathedral, a ringtone sounds.

“A reminder of modernity,” sighs the commentator.

Modernity. In the Washington National Cathedral and with all flags flying half-staff.


Can’t tell you just when or why or how it all went awry, but a Truman baby can tell you that it wasn’t always like this. Most of us may have been shy, but we’d support those willing to speak up for rules–written or understood–that call for the consideration of others.

Today, those who break rules, disturb the peace, and impose on others are to be tolerated. Those who complain or call attention to them are the ones to be criticized. “Let it slide” might as well replace E Pluribus Unum as our national motto.

We’d absolve the worst of thieves so long as they don’t thieve from us.

Or would you rather believe that a convicted felon becomes president of the United States thanks entirely to the high-financed schemes of a powerful few, and not at all to the day-to-day, carefree passivity of the let-it-slide many?

-654-

Thanks to a friend from Rome for the screenshot. That’s 1:00 AM. And that’s Rome, New York.

Plum Island National Anthem

In 1979, there may have been a secession movement on this glorified sandbar where I live.

Must say “may” because I didn’t wash a’shore, as the natives like to say, until August, 1982. So I don’t know just what happened while I was still playing Prodigal Son on the other side of the Mississippi River. Of course, the difference between the table-top, land-locked landscape of Dakota Territory and the tidal, now-you-see-it-now-you-don’t marshland and surf along the North Atlantic might convince anyone that there should be secession. How were the two places ever united to begin with?

One possible urge to secede is that, by 1979, many in Massachusetts were tired of the austere Gov. Michael Dukakis who urged them to follow his example and wear sweaters rather than turn up the heat. They voted him out, and voted in an even more austere Gov. Ed King who offered to have the state buy all private property on Plum Island and let it return to nature.

Only in retrospect can I connect this to a report in Time in 1977 that the much larger and actually real islands of Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard wanted to leave Massachusetts and join Vermont. As always, all things north of Boston are, forgive the pun, drowned out by all things south. Cape Cod entices visitors from all across the country. Our equally charming, if smaller and less dramatic Ann, if lucky, gains notice only when they arrive as “Massachusetts’ other cape.”

Can’t be sure, mind you, about our islands drifting off. I was then in North Dakota where a governor was voted out of office because of the ridiculously chaotic design of a new license plate coughed up by a committee selected by him that– Well, the word “committee” says it all.

After one King term, Duke was returned to Beacon Hill royalty in 1983. By that time, Plum Islanders were in a merry Michelob mood with Ronald Reagan’s “You can have it all!” McMansions were built on the dunes overlooking the ocean. Homes that were one floor became two, those that were two became three. It was as if architecture had become a function of biology.

So, I heard no dissatisfaction, much less talk of secession when I moved in. But I did hear a song.

Thankfully, turntables still existed. Over and over again, my cousin and his friends, now my new friends, spun “The Plum Island National Anthem” on a 45 vinyl as scratchy as the green head flies before I first heard it. We sang along with gusto, and whenever someone asked if I happened to be the guy playing fife, I would change the subject and let the thought linger.

And linger it did, perhaps because no musician other than singer/songwriter Richard Johnson is identified on the jacket. No doubt my fellow local flautist Roger Ebacher, like me, was asked that question. Unlike me, he likely gave an immediate, straightforward answer, as he did when I emailed an hour or so ago:

I recall this song well, and did perform it live with Richard on at least one occasion. I was not in the recording session, however, and have no memory of who was on it.

Gotta love the “at least one occasion” part of that answer. Back then we all made a habit of scrambling our memories as if to fry them with whatever we could find in the fridge. A whole new meaning to “pot luck.”

I was lucky to catch the “Anthem” before it had run its course and was pretty much out of mind by the time Duke ran for president in 1988 touting the “Massachusetts Miracle.” Can’t recall hearing it or hearing of it for at least 35 years.

Until today. A friend was “cleaning stuff out,” which is what we elderly folk say when we come within sight of life’s checkered flag. When he found it buried in a box, he immediately thought of his friend on Plum Island, and this morning he put it in my hands. I damn near fainted.

You can hear the song and read the lyrics with links in the caption for the photo below. The only lyrics now out of date are about having to truck our water in from town and not flushing when the water table is down. In a massive project that made the summer of 2007 one that only the houseflies fully enjoyed, the island was ripped up for the installation of water and sewer hook-ups.

As for the 45’s jacket, it says across the top, “Plum Island Records proudly presents the…” The banner under the fly reads, “Greenheadus Rex.” The six objects the bug holds are: a few arrows, an olive branch, a man yelling and waving his arms (likely the late, legendary Harry O, PI’s “unofficial mayor”), a can of beer just cracked open, a loud transistor radio, and, as if to make Jimmy Buffett feel right at home, a shaker of salt.

Buffett would be right at home here. This anthem was an ideal rallying cry to bring us together at home barbecues and at the old Beachcoma (that’s an accent, not a typo), now called the Rip Tide Cafe. But “Margaritaville” is the vibe once the party starts.

To conclude and to finish, I must note that nothing in the song declares independence. The word “National” appears only in the title, barely a hint. Perhaps the song on the B-side, also by Richard “Stonefingers” Johnson, tells us whether or not there was an actual secession movement.

Let’s see here: Hmmm, title is “Why Should I Marry?” Doesn’t sound like a call for independence to me. Like everything else on this now-you-see-it-now-you-don’t sandbar, sounds like just another yes-or-no question with answers that hem and haw and last forever.

Let’s give a listen:

Why should I marry,
When there are bridges, high windows, and rooftops to jump from?
Why should I marry,
When I can drive my car off a cliff?

Yes, like the “Anthem,” quite a scream, and it goes in that vein. And it could be construed as a declaration of independence. As morbid as the joke might be, it is in the course of human events.

-653-

THE PLUM ISLAND NATIONAL ANTHEM

Come all ye Newburyporters,
and listen to my song
If you’ve a short attention span I shall
not make it long

I am a Plum Islander; Plum Island is my home
When green head flies fill the skies,
no man walks alone

CHORUS: To me way, hey Plum Island, the only home for me
Sinking as the sun sets into Atlantic Sea.

We cannot drink the water here;
we truck it in from town
We cannot flush our toilets when
the water table’s down

We cannot drink the water, so all we drink is beer
And when the tides are running high
the roads all disappear!

CHORUS: To me way, hey Plum Island, the only home for me
Sinking as the sun sets into Atlantic Sea.

In my front yard there’s naught but sand where once I had a lawn
And my whole house sits on the beach
now that the dunes are gone

And on that beach in summer time,
a horde of tourists lie
And when you hear the screams you know
it’s lunchtime for the flies

CHORUS: To me way, hey Plum Island, the only home for me
Sinking as the sun sets into Atlantic Sea.

Someday Plum Island we shall make
an independent nation
Protected by our green head flies,
flying in formation

And when the storms are raging,
and snow is coming down
thank God we’ve got a bar out here
since we can’t get to town.

CHORUS: To me way, hey Plum Island, the only home for me
Sinking as the sun sets into Atlantic Sea.

FINALE: To me way, hey Plum Island, the only home for me
Sinking as the sun sets into At-Lan-tic Sea.

“Why Should I Marry?”

Can’t find the lyrics, but both male and female voices are clear enough. And I bet the clarinetist had a ton of fun!
https://stonefingers.net/bio.html#/

Carole Anne Ouellette

Carole Anne Ouellette, 74, passed away on December 16, 2024, at the Care One home here in Beverly.  She was born in Beverly Hospital, Nov. 23, 1950, the cherished daughter of the late Leo and Carolyn (Fielder) Ouellette.

Ms. Ouellette graduated from Salem State College in 1972 with a Bachelor’s degree in business administration.  While there, she played on the women’s tennis team, participated in theater, and took up pottery which she continued for many years.

In 1980, she graduated from the Suffolk University Sawyer School of Business with a Master’s in accounting and finance while starting her career with U.S. Bank & Trust in Boston.  She would later work for various firms on the North Shore

Ms. Ouellette’s professional success may be measured by the trips it allowed an avid traveler.  With her husband, the late John Yammerino of South Dakota, Ms. Ouellette traveled extensively through Europe, the US and Mexico, Canada and the Caribbean, once driving from Scotland to the southern tip of mainland Greece on a 6-week tour.

She loved to entertain in homes she kept bright and colorful.  Through the 80s it was a condo she and John remodeled in Salem.  After that, it was an apartment that John built atop the Ouellette family home on Foster Drive.  She continued to live there after John passed away in 2011 until a few years ago when her illness made it impossible for her to care for herself.

She had several musician friends and asked them to play along with John.  Live music was the pulse of her many gatherings, whether indoor, around the pool, or at a summer home John built on Kezar Lake in Maine.

Ms. Ouellette studied recipes and took pleasure in watching friends and family enjoy her creations, which were always anticipated and enjoyed at potlucks she attended.  In her own home, food and drink were often served on and in pottery she made.  And a few walls were graced with her paintings from her Salem State days.

“Carole had an exceptionally beautiful voice.  She loved to sing and was much taken by the music of Laura Nyro, Ann Murray, and especially Joni Mitchell,” says Charlie Beaulieu who became her frequent companion in the first week of freshman year at Salem State.  “She was a true and faithful friend.”

“Whatever Carole did, she did it exceptionally well,” adds her closest friend, Emily Cousens, who also knew her since college.  “Whether it be studying, working, cooking, hosting a party, singing, traveling, playing tennis, being a sister and friend, caring for her aging parents… she was the embodiment of carpe diem, and lived each day to its fullest.”

Ms. Ouellette leaves behind her brother Philip Ouellette of Beverly, and several cousins.  Services are 11:00 AM Friday, January 10 at the Campbell Funeral Home, 525 Cabot St., Beverly.

-652-

Circa 1992.
Plum Island, 2013. Photo by Michael Boer.