Loving the ‘Poorly Educated’

How often have you seen or heard someone ask how Trump’s “grab ’em by” remarks in 2016 did not prevent him from winning that election?

And how often have you seen the photo of him mocking the handicapped reporter with the same question posted on social media?

Both versions are lately being asked with increasing frequency in this election year while Trump racks up landslide after landslide in the Republican primaries.

Hard to tell if this is rhetorical, or if people actually expect and want an answer. To the former, I say there is an answer. To the latter, the answer is worse than you think.

Not only did he not lose any support, he actually gained it–both times. No one offended by either would have ever voted for him anyway. So he loses nothing. Much of the base that rallied to him in 2016 were people who never voted, people who disdain anything that requires thought or attention. Compassion? Ethics? You gotta be kidding!

Nor would they have voted in 2016, but they saw Trump, a self-styled champion of the crude and stupid. This is what has liberals who ask that question so perplexed. Liberals refuse to openly discuss crudeness and stupidity, disdain using the very words, put up a show of “respecting the intelligence” of Trump supporters. With that straight-jacket on their own ability to think, it’s no wonder they keep asking the question.

“Worse than you think”? Yes, because Trump supporters also see and crave him as a middle finger to the rest of us who talk of and strive for better government. Up until 2016, both Democrats and Republicans, despite wide differences, gave speeches and offered plans for an entire American population. Some of us subscribed to Democratic ideals, others to Republican, many to a balance of the two.

Trump’s appeal was to none of the above. Instead, it was and still is to those too lazy or too cynical to be bothered with any of it–people whose most cherished freedom is to not give a shit about others. People who will flock to a “Revenge Tour” and cheer the promise of “retribution.” People who always insisted, “They are all the same,” an excuse not to think and be smug about it. That’s why they hate what they call “woke” or “PC” and the slightest mention of diversity or inclusion–and why they are erasing any history that upsets their complacent present.

Democrats were appalled from the beginning. So were Republicans, but they were seduced by Trump’s contempt for government regulations on business, and so they made the Faustian bargain to take what they want and look away from what they would rather not admit.

Have I been too blunt, too harsh? Am I to be reprimanded for not “respecting their intelligence”? Or scolded for using words like “crude” and “stupid” talking about the people who cheered and applauded and voted for the guy who ridicules the handicapped and boasts of grabbing women when he’s not on trial for defaming the character of a woman he raped?

If so, I’ll be glad to hear your answers to the question that got me going. But I’ll have no patience if you keep asking it.

-30-

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3334489/Donald-Trump-slammed-outrageous-impression-disabled-New-York-Times-reporter.html

A Taste of Afterglow

And I thought potato pancakes were labor intensive!

You may wonder, as I did, just how many dishes are being prepared in the prolonged opening scene in the vast kitchen of a French estate a century ago. Action is non-stop as a master chef–“the Napoleon of the culinary arts”–directs his personal cook, Eugenie (Juliette Binoche at her most angelic), and a young assistant to boil this, blanche that, pour something else, drain yet more, all while moving a pot from the stove to the sink, a tray from a table into the oven, or chopping vegetables just out of the garden.

As will happen throughout The Taste of Things, sounds of chopping, simmering, and pouring serve as dialogue since, with the exception of Dodin Bouffant’s (Benoit Magimel’s) directions, the cooking scenes speak for themselves. Call it a dual feast, one each for food and film gourmets–with tracking scenes as long as elaborate 19th Century menus, visuals that tell the story while satisfying the appetite.

Eventually characters do speak. When Dodin describes ingredients and flavors and textures and seasonings and “subtle notes” to his cronies, you might wonder if the film is turning satirical. More than once, the Screening Room audience laughed out loud. But when he speaks with Eugenie, a love story unfolds.

Takes us by surprise after so much silence in the kitchen leads to an assumption that chef and cook are husband and wife, and even then the relationship is kept to the perifery of The Taste of Things with a mystery as subtle as any of the “hints” in the broth that, as Didon boasts, “only Eugenie can make.” Both sound as eager as parents hoping to adopt when they agree to bring an “astonishing” young apprentice, Pauline, into their kitchen, but the actual parents are hesitant.

Not much of a spoiler in telling you that they do marry, “in the autumn of our lives” as Didon declares. “Speak for yourself,” Eugenie chides him, “I’m in the summer. I’ll always be in the summer.” Indeed, by the time it’s over Eugenie will ask Didon a question that “is very important to me.”

Hard to tell which is more surprising: Her question or his answer. But that’s something of a dessert you shouldn’t have until you’ve finished the dinner.

-30-

Newburyport Postscript: Just five more shows at the Screening Room: Tomorrow (Tuesday) through Thursday at 3:45; Thursday again at 7:00; and a Saturday matinee at 12:45

Both Sides of a Cross

Listen to our side–to each other, to me–and the threat facing America as we know it comes from states already restricting voting, reproductive, and educational rights. Listen to the other side, and it’s from “illegal aliens” crossing our southern border.

The term all by itself highlights the difference in perception. From Central American countries they flee poverty, drug trafficking, and violence, the very definition of refugee, a word that should remind white Americans on any side of any divide of their own ancestors–or ring a Christmas bell with images of a nativity scene.

But it doesn’t, and so let’s ask what might.

Call it serendipity. While checking the Screening Room website to see what time I had to arrive one day, something I hadn’t seen caught my eye: “About the Owners” or, “About Becca & Ben” when you click it. Which I did. And there was Ben Fundis shaking hands with a broadly smiling Jimmy Carter whose other hand was giving Ben a thumbs up.

https://www.newburyportmovies.com/owners

That scene took place in Paris in 2008, but the reason for it was a documentary series, Border Stories, which reveals the lives of people who live and work along the 1,952 mile boundary between the US and Mexico. Fundis–one of the film’s three co-directors and writers along with Clara Long and John Drew–was in Paris to accept the “Every Human Has Rights” Media Award from Internews, a media development organization that hosted the celebration of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ 60th anniversary.

May seem like a folksie title for an award, but Border Stories engages as wide an assortment of people that you could hope to meet on any trip between two places spread over three time zones. The film takes us into homes and businesses across deserts and ranches on both sides of the Rio Grande, the southern boundary of the Gadsden Purchase, and California’s bottom line. As we listen to residents and workers from the Gulf to the Pacific, the subtitles on screen keep shifting to and from Spanish and English.

“Beyond a boundary drawn on a map, a border is a mosaic of stories from both sides of the line,” offers an introductory title. Before long, the film makes good on the claim.

We hear from one of 400 Mexican dentists–“more dentists than dogs”–in the border city of Progresso treating patients from as far as Minnesota looking for far-lower costs. Don’t know what those sets of false teeth go for, but crowns can be had for as low as $160, and “promoters” employed by the dentists might negotiate lower prices for a 10% slice–while also acting as translators.

We hear the mayors of Laredo, Texas, and Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas, testify that their cities and their people thrive in a co-existence now threatened by the imposition of new restrictions and a possible wall. They agree to a “mutual vision” for their “metropolitan area,” and they estimate a daily passage of 13,000 trucks and 1,200 rail cars. Says Mayor Raul Salinas on the American side:

I hate to say it, but immigration has become a racial issue… We legislate without ever coming to Mexican soil and say, we’re going to build a wall come hell or highwater. And that’s all attitude. I’m an FBI agent, retired, 27 years. I think I understand a bit or two about security. Don’t impede trade and commerce with security. Let’s not confuse both.”

Between cities, we hear residents of American towns who hire workers, and from the workers who cross the river daily to and from their homes on the Mexican side. We are taken inside medical clinics and schools on either side that serve both. As one insists, “When you live here long enough, you realize: There is no border.”

Even the American men who relish their golf course do not want a wall standing aside it.

We hear from self-styled patriots who have moved into the desert with hi-tech tracking systems and their Second Amendment right to protect America from what they believe are criminal hordes. One grew tired of “losing battles” in California before he realized that “a good general picks his battles,” and “what better place than the desert” in Arizona?

We hear from–and ride in the pickup alongside–a federal border agent in San Diego who seems somewhat amused by the irony of his own parents having been immigrants. But this is the good life they imagined for him, and now he’s able to care for them while doing his part to “keep immigration legal.”

And from Brownsvillle on the Gulf to Tijuana on the Pacific, we hear from people who want nothing more than to visit relatives, to move freely between old and new countries just as those of us of European descent have always been free to do.

Put this in the historical context of a Mexico that once extended north and west well past what is now Texas–with generations of a people deeply steeped in the religious concept of love thy neighbor–and the film brings to life one of Muhammed Ali’s most curious quips:

It’s not the deer that crosses the road, it’s the road that crosses the forest.

Border Stories asks just who is crossing what.

-30-

To view the film:

https://borderstories.org

A Day in the Marsh

After a three-month backslide, I walked just over a mile into the wildlife reserve and sat on a bench overlooking the marsh yesterday.

Admittedly, I didn’t set any speed records, but neither did I slow to a pace that would make anyone think I was in need of a walker. That embarrassment was reserved for my return. In fact, I sat for another ten minutes on the guardrail across from Parking Lot Two, about halfway back.

Still, two-and-a-quarter miles is a promising start to a renewed effort to keep what few clothes I have that still fit fitting. When I arrived back home, yes, I plopped onto my bed for awhile before standing in the shower, but I was nowhere near the comatose state I had feared. Moreover, on this morning after, I’m feeling rather optimistic because, right about noon, I’ll be doing it again.

None of this is urgent news. I offer it partly as encouragement to many who share my predicament: Exercise or scroll on social media after breakfast? And will breakfast be a banana with oatmeal or potato pancakes topped by sour cream?

Mostly, however, I’m here–and after breakfast I’ll be walking back there–to tell you about the bench where I sat for longer than usual yesterday. Actually, quite a bit longer than I ordinarily would in the cold of February, but not so long as I do in June or July when I carry a book or magazine and a pair of glasses.

Luckily the sun was out and any wind was blocked by the dune behind me. I almost wished I’d brought the new March issue of Harper’s, but soon an elderly couple came by and I was glad I didn’t. Always sitting at one end of the bench for just this reason, I invited them to sit. No, they were out for a walk–which gave me a pang of guilt for my own walk’s “intermission”–but did I know if those were black duck some 200 feet away on the salt panne in front of us.*

“That’s my guess, but I didn’t bring my field glasses. They’re the ones with the wide, fat bills, right?”

“Yes.”

“Well, zoom in with your camera and tell me.”

The two laughed, “But they all have their heads under water!”

“Well, get ready for one to come up. Can’t be long.”

But it was long, so long I started wondering if they were MAGA ducks.

“Boy, they sure like to eat,” the man said.

“I can relate to that,” I quipped.

The couple laughed again, wished me a nice day, and walked on. I turned back to the duck who kept their heads down. Then I noticed, and thought it a bit strange, that I could still hear the couple talking, though they were not at all loud, until they were well away from me.

That’s when I noticed that I heard nothing at all. The surf had to be down on the other side of the dune. The panne before me, according to the Beaufort Wind Scale, was “calm, mirror-like.” No cars drove by nor planes flew over for a solid five minutes. And there was no sound in the distance. I was sitting in absolute silence.

Eventually a car did pass, and before long another. But even then, I felt like I had attained–without realizing it, much less making any attempt–a higher level of being. On the other side of the two-lane road, three people walked by speaking in an Eastern European language that was so clear to me, I could have recreated it phonetically, syllable for syllable, had I a pen and a piece of paper.

After they were out of hearing, I noticed that the duck had disappeared, soundlessly, and chuckled at the thought that I should thank them for leaving the silence behind. So enthralled was I, that it took forever and great effort, perhaps aided by a string of four SUVs, one with bass thumping out its sides, to get me off the bench and on the way back.

Today, a Monday, there should be far fewer cars, and I’ll be returning to the bench after breakfast, potato pancakes topped with sour cream.

-30-

*Salt panne: a water retaining depression located within salt and brackish marshes.

Between the numbers for parking lots 2 and 3 you’ll see a marking for the Salt Pannes Wildlife Observation Area. That’s where the bench is. I live to the immediate left of 1 and ?, the gate to the reserve. And, yes, this map is sideways so that Left-to-Right is North-to-South, and East is where North should be.

Memories Are Unmade of This

So easy to overlook and laugh at the little lapses of memory that signal old age. Forgetting why we went into a room, where we put a book or a glass or glasses just moments ago in our hands, whether we returned that phone call or paid that bill.

I once paid a bill twice, not noticing the identical entry just above the second entry in my checkbook. Three months later I called when the same company sent a bill for $0.00. “Something went wrong,” I said. The woman on the phone was nice enough not to say just what had gone wrong. Cheerfully, she pointed out that I still had $20.00 credit on what would be due three months hence.

Then there are the missteps: putting a hot pot of coffee into the fridge, putting on shoes before pants, making the batter for potato pancakes step by step only to remember that you don’t have the last ingredient–the potatoes. Yes, I have done all those and more.

Some are serious, but I’ve been nearby to make a quick correction, and I now observe the rule of looking at the stove to make sure that I’ve fired up the burner under the kettle and that the kettle is not empty. S’pose I could do that by nose, as those empty pots sure smell funny, but the flame is immediate–like the pain from a casserole dish you forget is just out of the 425-degree oven.

This past week, however, I had one that, frankly, is cause for alarm. If I’m lucky, it was not a sign of a permanent condition, but a singular act of God to put me back in place after the pride I was taking thinking myself so sharp, so savvy, regarding the internet and its algorithims.

An email from a friend asked if I did much business with Amazon. He opened with a “sorry to bother you,” which I thought was a laugh, and there was a lack of punctuation that I ignored. Also, I just self-published a book that is new on Amazon, so I figured the real question was about availability, which I answered.

Within minutes I had an answer that began, “Good to hear back from you,” and then said he had a problem with his credit card, wanted to buy his niece a $200 gift certificate (“put a smile on her face”), and could I cover it until we next met? All so bizarre, I started examining the details that appear when you click “to me” under the sender’s name. The second email address (edress?) began with his last name, as did the first, but it was all different between there and .com. I checked my history of emails with him. All matched the first; the second was nowhere to be clicked.

I alerted him with a separate email, and then forwarded the exchange. Satisfied that I had stopped crime in it’s clumsy tracks, I made a note to turn my act of cleverness into a column that readers would print out and stick to their refrigerator doors as a reminder to be vigilant and a model for how to do it.

That would have to wait until I finished a column I thought just right for a historic seaport’s newspaper, a tribute to the inventor of the Beaufort Wind Scale on the semiquincentennial of his birth. All I had to do was extract it from the appendix in my first book, Pay the Piper, the very last item written for that book in 2014.

Reminding me of Francis Beaufort was a surprising gift I found in my mailbox last week, the Eldridge Tide and Pilot Book 2024. Pulling it out of the wrap, I spotted the plain, matter-of-fact fonts and a lot of low-point black text on the mustard yellow cover. Why would anyone send me a phonebook? I wondered, and then, Do those things still exist?

To some degree, this was a joke after I started telling people that the causeway–the one and only road–from this island to the mainland was closed during a high tide when there was no storm. Every winter, it’s closed a handful of times for high tides accompanied by a storm surge, but what happened a few weeks ago was new, and so I announced:

“I now need to consult a tidal chart to see if I have to leave two hours early to get to work, or hole up in a pub before I drive home.”

Fort Myers, a long-time sailor, took that so literally, she sent Eldridge. Fascinating stuff, especially the harbor maps up and down the Atlantic coast in a book that goes way beyond tides in explaining the meaning and uses of lights, signals, flags, and buoys. So reminiscent of Beaufort, that I went looking for a hook that would interest Newburyport readers and combine the two. Presto: The 250th anniversary of Beaufort’s birth.

Spent most of a day on it and had a full draft before putting it aside and going to the kitchen to make coffee. About when I lit the burner for a kettle of water, I had this odd feeling that made me turn and stare at the log that I keep of the headlines and dates of my Daily News columns. Then, in a rush, I went to it and flipped pages, also in a rush, to the entries for 2014. A sigh of relief was momentary, as my nose caught that unwelcome scent from the stove. In another rush in the other direction, I picked up the kettle, used it to push the empty pot off the flame, and then put the kettle down where it should have been.

Another sigh of relief was just a brief, as another vague memory crept in. Back to the log, I took a look at March, 2015. There it was, “As Irish as shooting the breeze.” A St. Patrick’s Day piece for a descendent of Huguenots who fled France’s “Wars of Religion” and landed in Ireland 200 years before he, Rear Admiral Francis Beaufort, was born in County Meath.

I had spent the entire day writing a column that I wrote nine years ago.

I returned to the kitchen where I made certain that coffee was in the French press before I poured the water, another occasional lapse of mine, and made sure that the burner was turned off. I left the laptop closed, put the press and a cup on my nightstand, and sat up in bed to sip the coffee–and to plot the outline of an essay admitting of an infirmity for my cleverness to transcend at best, disguise at worst, and offset at length.

At least until I burn down the house.

-30-

https://www.epicurious.com/expert-advice/how-to-put-out-a-grease-fire-article

My Futile Five Minutes

For my Newburyport readers and friends, and also for anyone who read my accounts of controversy at the Newburyport Public Library last summer, here’s a report on the NPL Board of Directors meeting Wednesday, or at least my futile five minutes worth.

Quotes may be inexact (and possibly out of sequence), but I think I caught the truth of it, and three others present–also in support of the expelled volunteers, the Archival Center, and the head archivist forced to “retire”–concur.

A key to the cast of characters: Sean Reardon is Mayor, and Ed Cameron is Pres. of City Council. Both are ex-officio members; Cameron did not hold that office and so was not on the NPL board when the controversy broke. Full disclosure: He is a guitarist & vocalist for The Pathological Outliers, a local band that I quite favorably reviewed in a blog, “Driving Rock & Roll’s Car,” summer of ’22.

Kevin Bourque is the new library head, and Jessica Atherton his top assistant believed to be one of two “senior” librarians behind the move to gut the Archival Center of volunteers and of the head archivist of ten or twelve years. Board member Jim Connelly, a lawyer, appeared to be the chair, as he was the only one who spoke–save one remark by the mayor–during “public comments.” Andrew Levine (not present) is the mayor’s chief of staff.

———

My Five Minutes

Nothing like a long drive to think long thoughts, and it took one to and back from Meredith, NH, Thursday to make any sense of Wednesday evening.

Looks like the board now has three empty seats, as just seven directors (inc. Reardon & Cameron) and Bourque & Atherton sat at the tables facing nine people.

I went intending to remain silent, unsure of my ability to contain my temper. But when no one answered Connelly’s opening invitation, at least not within a few beats, I announced that I had no comment, but one question. He told me I had five minutes.

To set it up, I repeated the scene of my meeting with Levine on June 27 regarding the 950-word smear, specifically the one line about “accepting money.” I did this in our first meeting on Jan. 30.

I made sure to turn my head from side to side, trying to make eye contact with all of them. Some looked down, some inc. Reardon met my eye.

Then, the question to the board: Were you aware that this was posted on the NPL site for at least three, possibly five weeks, including the money charge even though it was already established that it was nothing more than coins?

Connelly: “I’m pretty sure your five minutes are up.”

Me: “Fine, but that’s the question, where’s the answer?” I looked from side to side. Averted eyes. Blank stares. “It’s a simple yes or no question. Were you aware of it?” I kept lookin, pausing, repeating.

At one point, Reardon answered, addressing me by my first name, which took me by surprise for some reason. He said he asked that it be taken down when he learned of it.

Me: “But three weeks went by after I told your chief of staff about it.”

He said something about info not being conveyed, and I was a bit too stunned to realize that what he said, at least the wording of it, was an admission that he thought something was wrong with the statement. Given another chance, I’d ask him to name who was responsible for it. And exactly what he thought was wrong.

I kept looking at the board members, getting nothing in return, while re-phrasing and expanding the question, “Did you know? Did you approve?” until Connelly (the only one who spoke of the five) repeated: “Your five minutes are up.”

“Did this board know of the post?”

Connelly began to answer with talk of union personnel agreements. I cut in:

“I’m not talking about union contracts. I’m talking about ethics.”

“Well, your five minutes are up.”

I wish I had a white flag with me, or at least a white hankie that I could have held over my head and waved when I sat down. They simply called for the next speaker, and one got up and made a strong, comprehensive, and coherent case for the vols, the Archival Center, and the archivist they had just silently watched forced out.

When she was done speaking, the board looked just as it did when I was done. I do not believe that a single word of what either of us said registered with any of them.

EXCEPT: I think that just the fact of us talking, and the fact of others sitting there, have to be making them uneasy for what might yet come. Put another way, what we saw last night was a group of people who are hoping to wait us out.

Following this, they went to their mundane business. Bourque spoke forever in a sing-song voice that had me wishing I had a package of Excedrin III or a bottle of Jim Beam. Admirably, the other speaker kept an ear on it enough to insert a question about how use of the Archival center is or will be measured. And another took a lot of notes which may or may not include all six times Bourque said “enhance the user’s library experience.”

POSTSCRIPT: Only yesterday did I learn that the camera to record us was something new, never done before. A few tell me that this is a tactic to intimidate and discourage anyone from the public who might be disagreeable. I don’t doubt that assessment, but it’s lost on a Renaissance faire performer of 25 years with an instinct, maybe an involuntary reflex to ham it up at the sight of any such device aimed at me. On the other hand, I do admit I was surprised by it and wished I had gotten a haircut that afternoon.

-30-

Post Presidents Day

When the tab at the Screening Room counter came to $18.25, I couldn’t resist: “John Quincy Adams becomes president!”

The customer smiled, perhaps politely, and so I went on: “He lived in Newburyport three years, an apprentice to a lawyer.”

“Oh!”

“He played flute. Played in jam sessions at the Wolfe Tavern.”

Now she’s wide-eyed:

“We elected a Newburyport flautist president of the United States! Let’s do that again!”

Yes, another dozen patrons are now waiting to buy tickets, but that’s the advantage of a small cinema: Jack the Ripper doubles as Jack in the Booth, and so everyone knows they won’t be late for the start of the film.

Not only are they not impatient, they’re paying rapt attention. So, I blather on:

“JQA, the only ex-president to serve in Congress. For 17 years to his death in 1848, he was the leading congressional voice for abolition.”

I pause until they think I’m done. “He had the most productive post-presidency of any—until Jimmy Carter showed up.”

Reactions in the lobby were approving and emotional, as this happened the week that Rosalynn Carter passed away. I finally focused on work, hurriedly selling tickets and a few concessions.

The Carters’ never-ending work with Habitat for Humanity and the Carter Center’s mediation of conflicts, protection of human rights, and promotion of economic development are all well-known.

And recognized, as with the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002.

Having already devoted a Presidents Day column to Carter (“For a Sunday School President” 2018)**, here’s something else about his administration that went largely unnoticed, even at the time it happened:

Based on Rosalynn’s idea when Jimmy was Georgia’s governor, they launched an exchange program for localities in the state with others in Central and South America.

As First Lady, Rosalynn organized it on a national scale. Those who joined the “The Friendship Force” never stayed in hotels, but were matched with hosts according to what they had in common.

The foreign locale would send the same number with the same arrangements. In both places, guests would go to their hosts’ places of employment, schools, recreation centers, museums, cultural and athletic events.

In 1979, about 200 of us in Bismarck, North Dakota, signed up for ten days in Hamburg, Germany, home of namesake Otto Von Bismarck. My host was an editor of Die Zeit (The Times), possibly the largest circulating national newspaper auf Deutsch.

Our stay included a day-trip that required a half-hour train ride to the Bismarck estate. All of us North Dakotans and all German hosts were there to pick from the platters of endless trays of shot-glasses filled with schnapps.

Ever since, I’ve shaken my head at the stereotype of Germans as rigid, joyless people—which I would come to realize was the point of the Friendship Force.

Back in North Dakota, all of us—those who flew and those who played host—had high praise for the experience, urged friends and family in other cities to see about starting one, and still reminisce about it while wishing it might be re-created.

The Carters—before, during, and after their stay in the White House—come to mind when reading about John Quincy and Louisa Adams in Massachusetts, in European courts, and in Washington DC.

Rosalynn was Jimmy’s closest and most trusted advisor. Louisa was as much of a diplomat in St. Petersburg and London as JQ. Rosalynn had a knack for seeing through people that Jimmy lacked. Louisa made her hidebound husband more approachable.

If we had a Mount Rushmore for post-presidencies, there’s no question that Carter and Quincy Adams would be the first two faces on it.

For two more, the debate could be heated. Taft? Cleveland? Teddy Roosevelt? You could argue that Eleanor Roosevelt’s post White House years qualify her as FDR’s proxy.

Viewed through that lens, it’s clear that a post-presidency owes as much to the First Lady as to the office-holder.

And that such a Mount Rushmore would honor not four men, but two couples.

-30-

Photo by David M. Gallo
https://www.thefivefoottraveler.com/visiting-mount-rushmore/

*This is an op-ed column that I had under the headline, “On another Mount Rushmore,” in the Newburyport Daily News today, my 16th Annual “Presidents’ Day Address” as I started calling them in 2012 or so. This was delayed by three days, but this is Washington’s actual birthday, so here’s to technicalities.

**There’s also one for Quincy Adams in 2014, “He left his pipe in Newburyport,” which is included in my collection, Keep Newburyport Weird.

Presidents’ Day Special

Something not yet mentioned following news of the $399 golden sneakers: Old Glory wrapped around the back over the heel.

According to the “US Flag Code: American Flag Etiquette, Rules, and Guidelines,” a joint resolution passed by Congress in 1942:

The flag should never be used for any advertising purpose, nor embroidered on cushions or handkerchiefs, printed on paper napkins or boxes, nor used as any portion of a costume.

Most historians summarize that as “no commercial use,” and up until 1980 you never saw a flag or the image of one used to advertise anything or made a part of anything put up for sale. Then came the Reagan campaign with a PR team that wanted every photo-op filled with smiling faces of people in the background and to the sides waving small American flags. They got the idea, by the way, from fascists who rose to power in Europe 50 years earlier, but we’re not allowed to make that comparison, so I suggest you search for archival footage while I swallow the First Amendment.

What the Reagan campaign did was not exactly commercial use, but the tactic was so in-your-face, ever-present, colorful, and successful that advertisers took note. Gradually, Old Glory appeared in ads as part of a backdrop while cars drove by, while people shopped in stores, while Clydesdales delivered kegs of beer to bars, while a singer sang the National Anthem from the back of a cab stuck in traffic on the Brooklyn Bridge, and an umpire in Yankee Stadium held a cellphone to a microphone on a stand at home plate. Play ball!

As variations on the theme, ads were filmed at historic sites. At first you’d see Lincoln and Washington as statues in peaceful parks, but before long they were jumping into and rolling out of cars being chased on city streets. Hard to tell if they were playing stuntmen or stuntmen were playing them. Might have had to do with the Jeep Wrangler that drove right up Washington’s Mount Rushmore chest. Or was it Lady Liberty’s robes? Maybe that’s why the statue now stands for an insurance company.

During the Superbowl in which the Patriots beat the Eagles–two patriotic names there–I saw an ad that made me spit out the word “descecration.” The party’s host, a Navy veteran seven years my senior, told me that his father shared my opinion. That made me feel hopelessly antiquated, but, hey, we scored a touchdown and the beer was really good. I relaxed and enjoyed the nailbiter of a game, but something nagged me for weeks until the dawn’s early light snapped on: That’s not an opinion. It is literally in a Code to honor and display the flag in a section titled, “How Not to Display the American Flag.” (Emphasis the Code’s.)

Also in that section is a reminder of many flags that we have see since 2015–Old Glory with Orange Blowhole’s stern face embossed on it, other Stars and Stripes morphed with Stars and Bars. On cars and pickup trucks, on motorboats, in front of homes, but mostly at Trump rallies, including some used as battering rams on that “normal tourist day” at the Capitol and flown by “very fine people” marching in Charlottesville four years earlier:

The flag should never have anything placed on it.

Curiously, I never heard anyone who expressed indignation over African-American athletes kneeling during the National Anthem raise any voice over nine years of Trumped-down American flags. No surprise, then, that they won’t notice the flag’s crass placement on the backs of shoes, or that they’ll fork over $399 to his legal defense, put the shoes on their feet, and violate the Code themselves.

Some wag on social media posted a meme calling them “Air Treasons.” Good one! Ditto the pitch, “When you’ve GOT to run!” Before long, someone added, “They’ll give you bonespurs!” Then came a title for a movie adaptation, “White Men Can’t Jump Bail.”

Great stuff, but it all puts the emphasis on the seller. I’d rather put it on buyers too unaware to beware (or “anti-woke” as they so proudly hail), and call them Suckers!

The pitch? God, Guns, Guts, and Gullibility!

-30-

https://www.almanac.com/us-flag-etiquette-rules-and-guidelines

A Scan of Hi-Tech Scams

Santa Rosa tells me that California is considering a bill proposed by AT&T to eliminate all landlines. She says it may pass this summer.

When the call ended, I was still shocked. As friends and family find alternately frustrating and amusing, I’m one of the few remaining American adults who does not own a cellphone. And I’ve been both adamant and taunting about it, calling it a hi-tech ball-and-chain, and declaring that I’ll never be at anyone’s beck and call. On a less boisterous note, I do grin and bear the extra steps up I must take to secure tickets for the next Jethro Tull concert or enter a place with a locked door and a sign that begins, “Please call…”

Coincidentally, this came just hours after I stopped at a library to get a printout of a gift certificate I’d been sent in an email. But I couldn’t access my email due to “two-step verification,” which requires you have either a mobile device or a laptop with you. Here’s a modern day Catch-22: Had I a mobile device, I would not have needed the library’s computer. Moreover, if this is how it’s done, what’s the point of a password? And why aren’t those questions about your mother’s maiden name or your favorite song a suffcient second step? Are we being forced to buy mobile devices? I left without any printout, but my head had printed-in several notes, a flexible outline, and a headline with the word “Scam” that may yet prove useful.

Coincidental to that coincidence, it was just days ago I listened to someone tell of numerous states and cities considering “Must Accept Cash” laws. Local, state, and federal officials across the country are responding to complaints lodged against businesses–including hospitals and clinics–that require payment by credit card. Republicans and Democrats alike endorse it. Massachusetts passed such a law two years ago, but right here in Newburyport at least one medical clinic refuses to accept cash.

Of course, COVID escalated the use of cards rather than cash, and we seniors are left with the lingering habit. Younger folk prefer the cards, as anyone who works behind the counter of a cinema can vouch. Some may think that cards are all there is. More than once, I’ve had people young enough to be my kid or grandkid pop a head in the door to ask, “Do you accept cash?”

Credit cards may be convenient elsewhere, but at a cinema, most customers show up at the same time. And since it is within ten minutes of the start of a show, lines form. And at a small arts cinema where the ticket-taker, concessionaire, and projectionist are all the same person…

‘Scuse me while I spit the next sequence of words out of my spleen, hit delete, and take a few deep breaths…

Ah, that’s better! I get a lot of laughs by loudly thanking customers for using cash, raising my voice, putting my open hands aside my mouth, and feigning to look over the folks in front to those in the back of the line. Followed by, “Oh, you didn’t hear me?” which gives me the excuse to say it again. Louder.

Many seem to think of this as a simple trade-off, a small fee to pay for convenience. I wonder how many of the many ever consider that this “small fee” has to absorbed in the retail price. That, by the by, means that the price goes up for everyone–no matter payment by credit or cash, no matter buying a movie ticket or a tank of gas, a cup of coffee or a winter coat. And how many of those many then complain about inflation they experience while standing in supermarket checkout counters or looking at restaurant menus?

Difference sounds slight when considered one at a time, but they add up in little time. That’s why folks on social media keep posting reminders to pay a restaurant bill with a card if you must, but leave the tip in cash. Working for what’s called a “tipped minimum wage,” those who work for tips cannot absorb increases as well as any business that accepts credit cards.

And what is to blame for those increases? Inflation is so much easier to comprehend than any talk of “absorbed costs” or “price-gouging”–plus. it’s a single word. Not to mention that you can blame it on whoever is in charge at the time. No thought required. No need to question modern American dogma: Guvmint Bad, Capitalism Good! Why, it’s as convenient as the use of Visa to buy a bag of Sour Patch Kids.

But more: Not only are the credit card companies bilking us while we blame the very politicians who have tried to regulate them–and reward politicians who protect them from regulation–they have enthralled us with what they call, “Cash Back.” We’re now supposed to believe that they are doing us a favor because they are “giving back” some of the money we pay for products and services. No. They are reducing the amount they are skimming from us with the inflated prices they have caused by the imposition of their (spleen-word deleted) cards. They have so many fooled by this, that I hear and overhear their Madison Avenue-ese in real-life conversation:

“Cashback.” As a verb, a single word, as in “How do you cashback?”

Putting the phone down, still dizzy at the thought of a state going wireless, I gathered my thoughts as I often do, sitting still and looking out the window over the marsh. And I saw it right away, something that was there all along:

All these years, I’ve been looking out the window, through the wires, over the marsh.

Historians like to remind us that states act as laboratories of innovation and change that, if successful, the rest of the country might follow. For example, we have Oregon to thank for mail-in voting. In time, the rest of the country may consider the example that Maine is setting with the success of ranked choice voting.

Before California becomes a lab for wireless, there is strong opposition to AT&T’s plan. Residents who have been through the trauma of the state’s increasingly frequent fires and mudslides in recent years note that cellphones are more vulnerable than landlines to power outages.*

If there’s yet another technological answer to those fears, I’d like to see telephone lines taken down. And wouldn’t that be the time to put all remaining utility wires underground? Trucks and crews will be at every possible site. Just add an excavator.

I can always leave the ball-and-chain behind or turned off. Convenience isn’t worth it. But a clear view of the horizon is.

-30-

* https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/california/bay-area-residents-att-landline-service/3447198/#:~:text=Thousands%20of%20people%20have%20been%20expressing%20outrage%20to,all%20who%20want%20it%20in%20their%20service%20area.

https://www.newsweek.com/att-map-shows-california-areas-that-could-lose-service-1870227

A Dizzy Dancing Way to Feel

As we gather on modern-day America’s most representative holiday for the game that is the climax of it all, I remain stuck on last week’s Grammys.

So out of tune with popular music since the heyday of Dire Straits and Warren Zevon, I had no idea what songs were nominated or what any of them sounded like. Truth is, I was writing about a talk I had just heard at a local museum. All I wanted was background with an occasional announcement that would make me look up.

Ordinarily, I’d have put on a football or baseball game, but the Grammys are wisely broadcast on the first Monday night in ten months that has neither. So instead of a raised broadcaster’s voice or roar of a crowd to get my attention, I listened for blast-from-the-past names.

Speaking of things that most represent America, Tracy Chapman’s “Fast Car” from the 1980s slowly rolled onto stage with the unmistakeable swaying two-note bounce that made me look up before I or anyone else could see the guitarist/songwriter herself emerge from the shadows to sing it. Then it became a duet with a country singer unknown to me who made it a hit yet again just years ago.

Many marvelled at the combination of a radiant black woman folk singer in lyrical conversation with Luke Combs, a relaxed white male country singer. “A fleeting gift of harmony,” as one called it. The reference is, inescapably, to race, and it could as well apply to Stevie Wonder’s tribute to Tony Bennett who was projected on a screen behind the stage as they traded the lyrics of “For Once in My Life.”

To me, both were more generational than racial. True, Wonder is more my age, too old to be receiving a proverbial torch, but with Tony Bennett passing it, Wonder is still in the game. A few friends sent me pictures of Chapman busking in Harvard Square back in the 80s before the cafe owners started inviting her inside. She passed the torch to numerous buskers who perform to this day in the very recessed doorways she once played. As we saw and heard, she‘s still in the game.

Admittedly, I may be yet under the spell of Joni Mitchell’s rendition of “Both Sides Now” near the Grammys’ end. Slowed down, it was resigned yet content, a bookend to the coming-of-age tune seasoned with both whimsy and skepticism that caught our attention back in the turbulant 60s. With young Brandi Carlile on guitar beside her, you could see the torch being passed.

For anyone my age, that phrase, that metaphor, can’t help but recall what may be this country’s most memorable inaugural address, JFK’s “Ask not” challenge aimed at Boomers. Seven years later, I was in a college classroom listening to a youthful English teacher calling that our generation’s commencement address.

Today, I settle in to watch the full-blown American pageantry of a championship game punctuated by multi-million dollar commercials shown for the first time, a loud and flashy half-time show of global superstars, and the romance of a Grammy-winner and a popular, slap-happy star player that fascinates the public much the way that of Jack and Jackie did back in the days of Camelot. Can’t help but wonder:

Was Joni Mitchell’s rendition of “Both Sides Now,” as she sat in a chair and held her cane, my generation’s valedictory address?

-30-