For those of us who never quite left The Sixties, there’s something nostalgic about so many demonstrations in so many cities from coast to coast.
Call it bittersweet as we indulge in feeling young again while protesting injustices, some of which we thought we had erased a half-century ago.
Difference is that, back then, we gathered to protest one issue at a time. On Saturday in Newburyport, signs supporting Ukraine, others for Social Security, and as many more condemning and ridiculing Elon Musk vied for the lead among other signs promoting science, education, and other human endeavors now threatened by the Republican Party and their playbook, Project 2025.
A few signs asked motorists on High St. to “Toot for Democracy,” and most drivers did. Some went by with an occasional beep-beep while others laid on the horn for as long as it took them to pass a little over 300 demonstrators who lined Newburyport’s busiest through-street. Many added thumbs-up along with hoots and howls, as would most passengers. Trump trolls were so few and far between, six at most during the two-hour event, that they drew unanimous laughter and ridicule–especially the one with the Trump cardboard cut-out leaning from the passenger side window.
If that guy happens to be reading this, I’m curious: Do you also have the blow-up doll?
The horns and cheers made for a loud two hours. For some reason, someone brought a boombox to play what was intended to be inspirational music–upbeat protest tunes such as “People Get Ready” and “Get Together,” just to name two that I’m old enough to recognize. Call me old, but in addition to being completely unnecessary, there’s something gauche about recorded music at a live event. When protesting, if we can’t say it, sing it, play it, or write it on a sign ourselves, it shouldn’t be there.
Thankfully, the warmer weather will allow any of Newburyport’s many musicians to fill that role. As for yesterday, we were bundled up in coats with warm hats pulled down over our ears. Also in gloves, which I neglected to bring, only to be bailed out by a friend who had an extra pair in his pocket.
In The Sixties, for me, they were all anti-war demonstrations, and I don’t doubt that someone reading this might say that they were all for civil-rights. True, there might have been an incident that triggered a day’s march–such as the invasion of Cambodia or the verdict in the Chicago 7 trial–but they were all pieces in the same puzzle. For us, the Vietnam War, for others Civil Rights, and soon after, Women’s Rights.
Today, each piece seems a puzzle all by itself–until we realize that they all fit tightly in the frame of Project 2025. We were encouraged to bring signs that called attention to–or ridiculed–whatever we chose. The nightly news is nightly filled with calls for chainsaw cuts to all government services with a sprinkling of attempts to re-hire those just fired. Consequences usually are unforeseen to those who refuse to look, and their unspoken motive becomes loud and clear. When a friend asked her ten-year-old son what her sign should say, he suggested directing a question to the powers that be rather than any accusation or complaint:
Why are you doing this?
The only answer they have–to eliminate fraud and waste–rings hollow now that we see the shutting down of medical services, the lay-offs of veterans, the closures of national parks, the wild increases in prices of consumer goods, and numerous other consequences of what is nothing less and nothing other than a full-scale, across the foreign and domestic board attempt to privatize the entire United States government.
All while they have not uncovered a single instance of fraud. Considering that any “waste” that isn’t fraud is a purely subjective label, then the two words are applied to anything in the way of of Project 2025‘s goal–to privatize everything.
What popular support they have owes to decades of conditioning by the Republican Party amplified by Fox News–and other peddlers of paranoia posing as news sources–that all government is bad. It really set in with Ronald Reagan’s smiling pronouncement that “government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” In 1994, Newt Gingrich doubled down on that by replacing the smile with a scowl.
Still, for all the cuts they proposed, neither of them advocated total erasures of programs and personnel serving veterans, the elderly, the disabled, children in poverty. Furthermore, there certainly was no talk of abandoning our role as leader of the free world and aligning ourselves with dictatorships.
Now that the nation is seeing its own devolution unfold, both at home and on the world stage, the shock is setting in. And its expression is demonstrations we now see daily in cities both large and small, as well as in town hall meetings where Republican voters are now willing to say things that their elected Republican congresspeople do not want to hear. And the Republican National Committee’s response to this sudden, wide-spread public exercise of the First Amendment’s provision for the right of petition? Don’t hold meetings.
At yesterday’s rally, a friend my age–a fellow veteran of the Mayday demonstration in DC, 1971–said he worried that so few young people were present. Maybe that is why I felt nostalgic. Back then, it was all young people because the historical cause of the Vietnam War–America’s indulgence in colonialism–was so far rooted in the past, that our parents and grandparents didn’t notice it.
You can’t say that about Project 2025. A plan to turn democracy into a facade for a mega-corporation, a president into a CEO, cities into markets, citizens into consumers–all of it something brand new. This time around, it’s seen for what it is right away, so it stands to reason that the first wave of protests are filled with old folk who keenly see and feel Project 2025‘s threat to Social Security.
By the time schools break for summer vacation, with demonstrations still ongoing, the threats to the environment, education, healthcare, and most everything else will be impossible for anyone over the age of 14 to miss.
It is, after all, their future–just as in The Sixties, it was ours.
-678-
A 20-second pan of the the full crowd:
https://www.facebook.com/waltthompson1176/videos/665931469200146

Photo by Walt Thompson.






























