Props from Cradle to Grave

If it’s difficult to describe here at home after all this time, it was nearly impossible to talk at all while at Arlington National Cemetery twenty years ago.

The place demands silence. No talk above whispers to share and confirm the palpable awe all around you. If the concept of a memorial wasn’t enough to keep us quiet, there was the sight: the whiteness of the gravemarkers, the ordered rows both parallel and perpendicular, the exact distances, the cut of the grass, the appearance of guards, even the trees seemed uniform as they stood at attention casting generous, merciful shade.

Many tourists were there that late May day, warm enough for t-shirts and shorts. My friend and I were just as casual, but I marveled at the sight of several t-shirts with images and messages you wouldn’t want at a family gathering, and others so silly you wouldn’t want to be seen with anyone wearing them.

Sure seemed an insult to the place, and considering what the place is, an insult to the country. But the teens in them were well-behaved, quiet enough, and no-one objected, so on the tours went–with or without any expected reverence or deference.

And as we saw this week, it’s those in suits and ties whose desecration of hallowed ground forces us to speak out loud. Reports have since surfaced that the event itself was staged by the Trump campaign so they could slam Kamala Harris for not attending. That explains JD Vance’s seeming nonsequitur of a reaction, accusing Harris of “not bothering to show up,” even after the stunt, complete with abusive treatment of a cemetery official, was exposed. In effect, JD gave the game away.

Never seems to be any bottom to how low these characters will go, which is why I’m so tempted to dismiss the incident by seconding if not plagiarizing a friend who “did not mind him entering a cemetery. I did not like him coming out.”

Be that as it may, those objecting to Bonespur’s use of Arlington for a photo-op are forgetting what he and First Lady I-Don’t-Care staged in an El Paso hospital days after the mass shooting in a shopping mall in August 2019.

Tempting to say the same about those who rationalize their hero’s turning the grief of others into self-promos, but their forgetfulness has proven to be more deliberate or maybe selective than natural. I’ve been calling this willful ignorance, but events such as Charlottesville, Jan. 6, and the crude exhibitions at the El Paso hospital and now Arlington suggest that it is more like unwitting hypnosis.

Call this what you will, but you cannot call it normal, much less good:

An infant survived the shooting when both parents shielded him from the rapid, automated fire of an impressionable young Texan who drove 650 miles under the influence of Bonespur’s anti-immigrant rants to wipe out as many brown-skinned, black-haired shopping mallers as he could with a weapon designed for war-zones.

Thanks to the NRA’s hysterical, anti-historical, high-financed and selective interpretation of the Second Amendment, “war-zone” is defined as anywhere between the Canadian and Mexican borders. Over which of those borders or into which of our oceans the term “well-regulated” jumped to escape the NRA’s interpretation is anyone’s guess, but it’s worth noting the term’s abject failure to mean anything in the supposedly English-speaking USA–and never mind who penned it.

But I a-gress. Back in bi-lingual El Paso, both parents perished while protecting their son and are now surely enjoying Republican thoughts and prayers for their efforts. Their protection was so thorough that the baby was quickly released from the hospital into the custody of an aunt and uncle.

Apparently under the hypnosis of “Make America Great Again,” when they heard that Bonespur was making an obligatory visit to the hospital, they returned with the boy. Likely they are Catholics, possibly among many Hispanics for whom abortion is the first and foremost political issue. Be that as it may, they jumped at the honor of being photographed with a man who compares himself to Jesus Christ, autographs Bibles and offers them, upside down or rightside up in return for campaign donations.

And so the pic was taken. Bonespur couldn’t resist adding a thumbs up to his smile. Assigned to display the living, breathing prop, I-Don’t-Care thoughtfully left her jacket on the plane.

At Arlington, he did the same following an invitation to the cemetery from a Gold Star mother who has been convinced that Joseph Biden and Kamala Harris killed her son in Afghanistan, proving that, under hypnosis, you can be led to believe and say anything.* I-Don’t-Care, not needed for a display, stayed home with her jacket.

To think that 20 years ago I was shocked by people wearing frivolous, nasty, suggestive, and at times border-line obscene t-shirts at Arlington when walking in groups around the tombs, the crosses, the markers! I recall thinking that neither “evolution” or “intelligent design” could be applied to what was in front of me.

Today I see a man use a cemetery and a hospital as photo-ops, graves and orphaned babies as props, while knowing he has the presidential nomination from one of our two major political parties and has a reasonable shot at returning to the White House.

Many Democrats claim that the November election will be a choice between democracy and authoritarianism. While I do not disagree, I suggest that another dichotomy may be more to the point:

Democracy vs. devolution.

-622-

Here’s what her news sources never tell her:

Oh, you villain, villain, damned, smiling villain! Where’s my notebook? I should write down that one can smile and smile, and still be a villain. Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 5

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/orphan-thumbs-up/
Image courtesy of Office of First Lady I-Don’t-Care

While Ours Already Did

For those who have been reading Mouth of the River, whether following it or tuning in now and then or trying it for the first and/or last time, please know that your comments are welcome.

Except when they say nothing about the content of the blog.

Yesterday, my blog headlined “A Pair of 17-Year-Olds” commented on a meme that juxtaposed photos of Greta Thunberg with a megaphone at a rally and of Kyle Rittenhouse with an automatic rifle at a protest. The meme turned the two into emblems for left and right: “Our 17-year-old vs. their 17-year-old.”

Here, in its entirety, is the comment made this morning:

yours is trying to make the world a better place while ours already did.

The blog, very short by Mouth of the River standards, offers context for both, none of which was in the meme. Also worth noting that I dropped the pronouns, “our” and “their,” for the sake of a comparison that I’ve not heard anyone else make:

A Trumper could (post) this identical (meme) and expect–and get–agreement. Those who approve of the acquittal do so not in spite of violence, death threats, intimidation, and racism, but because of them.

No telling if the commenter chose to ignore that line or if he ever saw it. It is a habit of right-wingers–and, yes, many left-wingers and tail-enders–to react to a headline, a photo, and what little appears on the post before the link to the full article. That’s why the comments sections on many news sources’ websites are filled with superficial dismissiveness, platitudes and cliches, and personal attacks that have nothing to do with the subject.

There’s nothing in this morning’s comment that indicates any knowledge of what is in the post. Therefore, it will not be added to it.

However:

Thankful am I that this (non)reader has, albeit unwittingly, proved my point. Rather than let him get lost in the comments section of a past blog, I’ve chosen to make him the subject of this new one. As for the “better world,” numerous posts and comments by Rittenhouse supporters responding to comparisons of him to Greta Thunberg and to poet Amanda Gorman use the word “trying” for them and “already did” for the vigilante

What could they possibly have in mind but the National Rifle Association’s vision of a gun in every belt and pocketbook?

This morning’s commenter is invited to answer this question, but only if he can manage the 350 words leading up to it.

-30-