When the supplemental checks ceased some 18 months after most places were shuttered for the plague, I realized I had to get back to work to make ends meet.
Wouldn’t take much, as I’m already on Social Security, but I’m one of those who, let’s just say, joined the workforce late. As I tell my friends, I had my retirement in my twenties, so now I must work till I drop.
Fair enough. Problem was that the cinema I’d been with since 1998 changed hands during the shutdown. When it finally reopened with so many restrictions on attendance, I couldn’t imagine how the new owners could possibly afford an employee. So I never asked.
I had also been driving a delivery van for a chocolate and fudge company that hadn’t called. Since I had already asked for a reduced schedule before the shutdown, they may have figured that I had finessed a painless, de facto, “never-can-say-goodbye” retirement.
Was it just lucky coincidence that my third gig at a Renaissance festival began on the very day that the COVID payments ended? That’s just eight weekends, but it covered me for three months. I bought time.
And I finessed it. With my year-round employment seemingly off the table, I recalled a previous life–1986 to 2002 to be specific–when jobs began just after Labor Day, broke for the holidays, began again after New Year’s, and ended with sessions called “summer” even though they were over by the Fourth. If you’re good at riddles, you recognize the life of a teacher. In my case, the adjunct circuit for college writing instructors.
This allowed me to make myself known to the heads of English departments at the ten or so remaining campuses within a forty-mile radius where I did not burn bridges 20 years ago. By applying after Labor Day, I was able to delay any commitment until after New Year’s while letting them know I’d be ready on a moment’s notice.
Bizarre as it seems, that’s how a lot of that scheduling was done back in my day. According to the five dept. heads I heard from, that’s how it’s still done. They even gave me specific dates in January 2022 to get back in touch.
I never did. Two weeks after the start of the renfaire, the Screening Room brought me back for a night a week. Since they, a married couple, can double-team on busy weekends, and since all theaters require technical preparations and book work on Thursdays and Fridays, we settled on Wednesdays. With that, I’d need just one class each semester, the Tuesday-Thursday format always preferred by adjuncts, a far cry from the four, two each at two schools covering five days and who knows how many miles, that most adjuncts juggle.
That need disappeared two weeks after the faire ended. With the holiday season about to start, I recalled the various friends and relatives of the chocolate company’s owners showing up to make various special deliveries, mostly large orders for businesses to give their employees. A few of those would get me to January, so I dropped in.
“How would you like a regular Thursday route?”
“You mean year round?”
“Yes.”
“Yes?”
“Yes.”
“Yes!”
My enthusiasm amused him, but he had no way of knowing what was behind it. He thought he was offering me a part-time job, but what he really gave me was a ticket to avoid a return to the classroom.
At dinner on that Thursday in late November, 2021, I was most thankful for that.
Thankful for my own sake, rueful for what it says about all else.
When I began teaching on the adjunct circuit, and before that in the early Eighties when I taught as a graduate assistant in South Dakota, classrooms hummed with curiosity and expectation, engaging and vibrant. Maybe it was just me and my own bring-back-the-Sixties wildness, and I was too naive to notice anything else. Maybe it was having students brand new to college taking their first classes outside of their hometowns and tight-knit high schools.
In South Dakota it all began when students smiled and smirked and laughed openly at my Boston accent. When they heard me laugh back, it was all I needed: “What’ll your parents say when you tell them you have an English teacher who can’t pronounce the letter R?”
In one class, some wag shot back: “They’ll say you should be disqualified from correcting our spelling!”
I knew he would do well. I also realized that, with or without a regional accent, if I could make a class laugh, the subject would teach itself.
And that’s how it went through the Eighties and into the Nineties when college and universities for some bureaucratic reasons started making everything standard and formal. I call it “The Yawning of the Age of Appropriate.” There was no room for improvisation and even less tolerance for any challenges that might be out of any student’s “comfort zone.” Education at its best was out of bounds.
Laughter? Better be in bounds, and those bounds are small. You could make all but one laugh, but if that one took it literally, took offense, you were toast.
I was toast, and when I asked at a faculty meeting, “Is this a college or a nursing home?” I was burned toast. It was a slow process, and I saw the effect in the classrooms where students had slowed down, perhaps because they knew that they were the ones being processed.
Since then, reports from friends in academe have not been encouraging. Without realizing it at the time, I did leave just in time to avoid the advent of cellphones and ringtones sounding in classrooms. Never mind hurting a student’s feelings, I’d be hurting their noses and knocking out teeth if I or another student were interrupted by one of those–or I’d make a wisecrack about it and hurt cellphoner’s feelings.
In academe as I left it and as I hear it described today, spontaneity means suicide, and there’s no room for serendipity on the syllabus.
Argue that if you will, academe has become no country for this old man. Despite that, when it came time to find work a few years ago, I figured I’d silence that sound when I heard it.
And so the emails went out and a few were answered. What happened next was blogged in real time under headlines “Call Me Rip” and “I Are Not Stupid.” The first was my reaction to technological requirements that did not exist 20 years ago–the same amount of time that Rip Van Winkle took his snooze before awakening to a new world. The second my response to what are called “preferred pronouns,” in which I propose e (e, es) as a non-binary option to avoid the awkward confusion of a plural used for a singular for an otherwise identifiable individual.
Had I gone though with it and made those phone calls in January 2022, I’d have been tempted to change any requirement that I state “preferred pronouns” to “preferred adjectives.” Why not? If people can possess pronouns–as in my pronouns–why not other parts of speech?
To this day, I wish I had, as I imagine expressions on the faces of Ph Ds named Diane and Michael who felt the need (or obeyed a requirement) to add, respectively, “she, her, hers” and “he, him, his” to their names upon receiving my application with preferred adjectives: witty, erudite, articulate, charming, handsome.
Would they at least laugh before throwing it in the trash? Or is laughter “inappropriate”?
-30-





















