Five years ago, I came into an unexpected sum of money that, in my salad days, would have bought a reliable used car. In 2020, it might have covered the cost of a reasonably good set of tires.
‘Twas the Christmas season, and my various circles of friends were celebrating the holidays atop their celebrations of Joe Biden’s victory over the personification of self-interest.
Yes, that victory was reversed four years later, and that reversal prompts this memory as an introduction to what I’m about to propose in this little ditty that might also be headlined, “Donation Wise, Tax Foolish.”
For now, let us keep our attention on December 2020. At the time, while we were so relieved the country was rid of a never-ending embarrassment of a president, we were also faced with the prospect of a Republican-controlled senate.
That was left undecided by two US Senate elections that required run-offs. Both were in Georgia and scheduled for January 5. Republicans needed just one to retain control of the Senate, keeping Mitch McConnell as Senate President.
This would have paralyzed a Biden presidency. McConnell, who openly reveled in the nickname, “Grim Reaper,” had already stripped Obama of a Supreme Court appointment. That move paved the way for the repeal of Roe v. Wade and the 2024 ruling that, in effect, holds that a president, contrary to any honest reading of the US Constitution, is above the law.
There I was–a senior citizen in need of part-time employment–with an unexpected $500 in hand.
I have made a few political contributions along the way: Bill Bradley in the 2000 primaries; Kerry in 2004; Obama in 2008; Sanders in 2016, each for a meager $20 or $25. To be fair, I figure that I supplemented each by writing endorsements for all of them as far back as Walter Mondale in 1984 and Jerry Brown in 1988–including Gore and both Clintons who topped my preferred candidates in primaries. The local paper for which I write does circulate in New Hampshire, a swing state.
Pondering all of that, I asked that, rather than any gifts for me, friends and relatives donate to the Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock campaigns in Georgia. I then sent a $200 check to each, and spent a good chunk of the remaining $100 on beverages that might help me either celebrate the results or forget that the $500 ever existed. Both candidates won.
That helped, but Biden paralyzed himself by appointing a cadaver as Attorney General. In fear of political backlash, the Biden Administration did nothing to bring the planners of January 6 to justice until Republicans could whine that it was “too close” to the presidential election. It was cowardice wrapped in the rigor-mortis of procedure. And as Herman Melville observed of European revolutions in 1848 that neglected to hold overthrown parties to account:
Victory reverts to the vanquished.
And so it is that the personification of self-interest has re-taken the White House–demolishing some of it–while the Republican Party has re-taken both the Senate and the House. In just one year, they have slashed funding for every humanitarian interest that cannot be monetized for the benefit of their donors. All kinds of scientific research, especially medical, including the Affordable Care Act, top the list, followed by numerous programs for children living below the poverty line, for veterans, for victims of natural disasters.
Internationally, the Center for Global Development estimates that the Republican slashing of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has already resulted in over half a million deaths, most of them children who succumb to starvation while shiploads of food rot in their third-world ports.
Meanwhile, we are watching more and more television ads asking us to donate to charities that hope to meet those same needs. Question: Which is higher, the amount of federal funds that would be allocated by a Democratic Congress with a reasonable corporate tax-rate, or the amount of individual donations from those who can afford it and are so inclined while corporations skimp on taxes, report record profits, and dole out billions in bonuses for CEOs?
A loaded question? That’s only because the load is of plain, irrefutable truth.
This is not to be construed as a case against donating to charities. But it is a case that, in a time when a Republican-controlled Congress is slashing every cent it can from humanitarian needs, our donations will be better spent on candidates who will take Congress out of Republican hands.
In 2026, there are ten Senate seats considered closely contested–including that of Jon Ossoff in Georgia–as well as numerous House seats. The division is so close in both, that it would take just a few to flip them.
My admiration goes out to those who reach for the checkbook when they see an ad for malnourished children in Africa, or for children fighting cancer here in America, and I will continue to applaud them.
At the start of this mid-term election year, however, we would do better to stop being Donation Wise, Tax Foolish.
-772-




















